PAYTM.NS vs. CRWD

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about One97 Communications Limited (PAYTM.NS) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD).

Performance

PAYTM.NS vs. CRWD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a ₹10,000 investment in One97 Communications Limited (PAYTM.NS) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PAYTM.NS vs. CRWD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PAYTM.NS One97 Communications Limited	-22.55%	27.61%	60.18%	19.67%	-60.21%	-14.50%
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.	-11.91%	43.56%	38.07%	144.17%	-43.05%	-22.28%

Different Trading Currencies

PAYTM.NS is traded in INR, while CRWD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CRWD values have been converted to INR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAYTM.NS achieves a -22.55% return, which is significantly lower than CRWD's -11.91% return.

PAYTM.NS

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: -5.04%
• YTD: -22.55%
• 6M: -12.42%
• 1Y: 22.99%
• 3Y*: 16.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRWD

• 1D: 1.21%
• 1M: 3.00%
• YTD: -11.91%
• 6M: -15.79%
• 1Y: 16.64%
• 3Y*: 48.93%
• 5Y*: 21.96%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PAYTM.NS vs. CRWD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAYTM.NS

PAYTM.NS Risk / Return Rank: 59
PAYTM.NS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
PAYTM.NS Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
PAYTM.NS Omega Ratio Rank: 55
PAYTM.NS Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
PAYTM.NS Martin Ratio Rank: 64

CRWD

CRWD Risk / Return Rank: 44
CRWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
CRWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
CRWD Omega Ratio Rank: 41
CRWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
CRWD Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAYTM.NS vs. CRWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for One97 Communications Limited (PAYTM.NS) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PAYTM.NS	CRWD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.64	0.37	+0.27
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.08	0.84	+0.25
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.11	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.95	0.55	+0.40
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.90	1.47	+1.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PAYTM.NS vs. CRWD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAYTM.NS Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is higher than the CRWD Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAYTM.NS and CRWD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PAYTM.NS	CRWD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64	0.37	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.44	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.19	0.70	-0.88

Correlation

The correlation between PAYTM.NS and CRWD is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PAYTM.NS vs. CRWD - Dividend Comparison

Neither PAYTM.NS nor CRWD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

PAYTM.NS vs. CRWD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAYTM.NS drawdown since its inception was -82.37%, which is greater than CRWD's maximum drawdown of -65.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAYTM.NS and CRWD.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAYTM.NS	CRWD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.37%	-67.69%	-14.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.89%	-37.18%	+7.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-67.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-44.07%	-28.41%	-15.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-55.30%	-23.93%	-31.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.79%	14.71%	-4.92%

Volatility

PAYTM.NS vs. CRWD - Volatility Comparison

One97 Communications Limited (PAYTM.NS) has a higher volatility of 15.10% compared to CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) at 11.81%. This indicates that PAYTM.NS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAYTM.NS	CRWD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.10%	11.81%	+3.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.32%	30.88%	-4.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.30%	45.23%	-8.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.21%	49.78%	+2.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.21%	55.56%	-3.35%

Financials