PAYTM.NS vs. CRWD

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PAYTM.NS (One97 Communications Limited) and CRWD (CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Software - Infrastructure industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 3 years, PAYTM.NS returned 14.00%/yr vs 75.65%/yr for CRWD. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PAYTM.NS vs. CRWD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a ₹10,000 investment in One97 Communications Limited (PAYTM.NS) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

PAYTM.NS is traded in INR, while CRWD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CRWD values have been converted to INR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAYTM.NS achieves a -18.51% return, which is significantly lower than CRWD's 63.55% return.

PAYTM.NS

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: -2.71%
• YTD: -18.51%
• 6M: -20.33%
• 1Y: 12.66%
• 3Y*: 14.00%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRWD

• 1D: -3.73%
• 1M: 51.85%
• YTD: 63.55%
• 6M: 49.49%
• 1Y: 74.22%
• 3Y*: 75.65%
• 5Y*: 35.45%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAYTM.NS vs. CRWD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PAYTM.NS One97 Communications Limited	-18.51%	27.61%	60.18%	19.67%	-60.21%	-14.50%
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.	63.55%	43.56%	38.07%	144.17%	-43.05%	-22.28%

Correlation

The correlation between PAYTM.NS and CRWD is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2021	0.01

The correlation between PAYTM.NS and CRWD shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PAYTM.NS vs. CRWD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAYTM.NS

PAYTM.NS Risk / Return Rank: 51
PAYTM.NS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
PAYTM.NS Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
PAYTM.NS Omega Ratio Rank: 47
PAYTM.NS Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
PAYTM.NS Martin Ratio Rank: 53

CRWD

CRWD Risk / Return Rank: 72
CRWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
CRWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
CRWD Omega Ratio Rank: 72
CRWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
CRWD Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAYTM.NS vs. CRWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for One97 Communications Limited (PAYTM.NS) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PAYTM.NS	CRWD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.36	1.68	-1.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.75	2.25	-1.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.29	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.42	2.10	-1.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.04	5.23	-4.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PAYTM.NS vs. CRWD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAYTM.NS Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the CRWD Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAYTM.NS and CRWD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PAYTM.NS	CRWD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36	1.68	-1.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.16	0.90	-1.07

Drawdowns

PAYTM.NS vs. CRWD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAYTM.NS drawdown since its inception was -82.37%, which is greater than CRWD's maximum drawdown of -65.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAYTM.NS and CRWD.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAYTM.NS	CRWD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.37%	-65.47%	-16.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.89%	-35.61%	+5.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-67.89%	-44.20%	-23.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-64.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-41.15%	-7.30%	-33.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-54.62%	-21.80%	-32.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.17%	14.25%	-2.08%

Volatility

PAYTM.NS vs. CRWD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for One97 Communications Limited (PAYTM.NS) is 11.95%, while CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) has a volatility of 16.20%. This indicates that PAYTM.NS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAYTM.NS	CRWD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.95%	16.20%	-4.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.34%	36.19%	-7.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.53%	44.70%	-9.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.76%	50.33%	+1.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.76%	55.61%	-3.85%

Dividends

PAYTM.NS vs. CRWD - Dividend Comparison

Neither PAYTM.NS nor CRWD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PAYTM.NS and CRWD in my portfolio?

PAYTM.NS and CRWD have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.