PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTNX vs. VST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NTNX vs. VST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX) and Vistra Corp. (VST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTNX achieves a 14.16% return, which is significantly higher than VST's -7.89% return.


NTNX

1D
-0.42%
1M
15.07%
6M
50.04%
YTD
14.16%
1Y
-18.17%
3Y*
25.00%
5Y*
10.38%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.48%

VST

1D
-0.29%
1M
-1.89%
6M
-6.16%
YTD
-7.89%
1Y
-28.40%
3Y*
76.26%
5Y*
53.38%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
29.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$147.08M$169.44M$196.62M
$607.28M$633.08M$737.36M

NTNX vs. VST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NTNX
Nutanix, Inc.
14.16%-15.51%28.29%83.07%-18.24%-0.03%1.95%-24.84%17.89%32.83%
VST
Vistra Corp.
-7.89%17.66%261.52%70.73%5.08%19.57%-11.87%2.46%24.95%18.19%

Correlation

The correlation between NTNX and VST is -0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2016

0.20

The correlation between NTNX and VST shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.23 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NTNX:

$15.95B

VST:

$49.97B

EPS

NTNX:

$0.94

VST:

$9.68

PE Ratio

NTNX:

62.94

VST:

15.31

PS Ratio

NTNX:

6.31

VST:

1.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

NTNX:

$2.75B

VST:

$17.20B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NTNX:

$2.39B

VST:

$1.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

NTNX:

$293.53M

VST:

$4.34B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTNX vs. VST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NTNX
NTNX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
NTNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
NTNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTNX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

VST
VST Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
VST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VST Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
VST Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
VST Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
VST Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NTNX vs. VST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX) and Vistra Corp. (VST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NTNXVSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

0.93

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.37

-0.75

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.59

-1.25

+0.66

NTNX vs. VST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTNX Sharpe Ratio is -0.46, which is comparable to the VST Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTNX and VST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NTNX vs. VST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTNX drawdown since its inception was -80.40%, which is greater than VST's maximum drawdown of -53.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTNX and VST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTNXVSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.40%

-53.32%

-27.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.58%

-38.01%

-19.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.58%

-48.80%

-9.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.71%

-48.80%

-19.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.96%

-31.71%

+2.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.51%

-13.90%

-26.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.74%

22.95%

+13.79%

Volatility

NTNX vs. VST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX) is 8.92%, while Vistra Corp. (VST) has a volatility of 12.98%. This indicates that NTNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTNXVSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.92%

12.98%

-4.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.38%

34.02%

+0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.19%

48.95%

-1.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.66%

48.14%

+1.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.26%

42.23%

+16.03%

Dividends

NTNX vs. VST - Dividend Comparison

NTNX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
NTNX
Nutanix, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VST
Vistra Corp.
0.61%0.56%0.63%2.13%3.12%2.64%2.75%2.17%0.00%0.00%14.97%

Financials

NTNX vs. VST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nutanix, Inc. and Vistra Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

NTNX vs. VST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Nutanix, Inc. and Vistra Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

NTNX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Nutanix, Inc. reported a gross profit of 610.68M and revenue of 703.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.9%.

VST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vistra Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

NTNX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Nutanix, Inc. reported an operating income of 68.56M and revenue of 703.07M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.8%.

VST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vistra Corp. reported an operating income of 1.50B and revenue of 5.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.

NTNX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Nutanix, Inc. reported a net income of 72.09M and revenue of 703.07M, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.

VST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vistra Corp. reported a net income of 980.00M and revenue of 5.64B, resulting in a net margin of 17.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NTNX and VST have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VST has higher volatility (12.98%) compared to NTNX (8.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTNX dropped -80.40% vs VST's -53.32%.

NTNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.46 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTNX and VST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer