NTNX vs. AMR

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NTNX (Nutanix, Inc.) and AMR (Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.) are both stocks. NTNX operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while AMR operates in Coking Coal (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, NTNX returned 10.43%/yr vs 60.15%/yr for AMR. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NTNX vs. AMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX) and Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTNX achieves a 6.35% return, which is significantly lower than AMR's 7.67% return.

NTNX

• 1D: 3.64%
• 1M: 26.57%
• YTD: 6.35%
• 6M: 16.68%
• 1Y: -28.74%
• 3Y*: 22.88%
• 5Y*: 10.43%
• 10Y*: —

AMR

• 1D: 1.14%
• 1M: 14.16%
• YTD: 7.67%
• 6M: 16.64%
• 1Y: 93.66%
• 3Y*: 14.91%
• 5Y*: 60.15%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTNX vs. AMR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NTNX Nutanix, Inc.	6.35%	-15.51%	28.29%	83.07%	-18.24%	-0.03%	1.95%	-24.84%	17.89%	80.92%
AMR Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.	7.67%	-0.12%	-40.95%	133.87%	150.06%	436.94%	25.64%	-86.23%	10.71%	-4.69%

Correlation

The correlation between NTNX and AMR is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2017	0.15

The correlation between NTNX and AMR shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap NTNX : $16.05B AMR : $2.75B
EPS NTNX : $0.93 AMR : -$3.00
PS Ratio NTNX : 5.90 AMR : 1.31
Total Revenue (TTM) NTNX : $2.75B AMR : $2.12B
Gross Profit (TTM) NTNX : $2.39B AMR : $31.72M
EBITDA (TTM) NTNX : $293.53M AMR : $128.60M

Return for Risk

NTNX vs. AMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTNX

NTNX Risk / Return Rank: 19
NTNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
NTNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
NTNX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
NTNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
NTNX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

AMR

AMR Risk / Return Rank: 79
AMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
AMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
AMR Omega Ratio Rank: 75
AMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
AMR Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTNX vs. AMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX) and Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NTNX	AMR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.63	1.55	-2.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.66	2.31	-2.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.26	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.50	2.70	-3.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.84	6.06	-6.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NTNX vs. AMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTNX Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the AMR Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTNX and AMR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NTNX	AMR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.63	1.55	-2.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21	1.01	-0.80
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	0.21	-0.13

Drawdowns

NTNX vs. AMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTNX drawdown since its inception was -80.40%, smaller than the maximum AMR drawdown of -97.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTNX and AMR.

Drawdown Indicators

	NTNX	AMR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.40%	-97.35%	+16.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-57.58%	-34.85%	-22.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-58.58%	-77.51%	+18.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-68.71%	-77.51%	+8.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.83%	-51.33%	+17.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.59%	-40.34%	-0.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	34.13%	15.51%	+18.62%

Volatility

NTNX vs. AMR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX) is 16.60%, while Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) has a volatility of 19.30%. This indicates that NTNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NTNX	AMR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.60%	19.30%	-2.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.59%	40.42%	-4.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.98%	60.76%	-14.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.71%	59.88%	-10.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	57.17%	73.71%	-16.54%

Dividends

NTNX vs. AMR - Dividend Comparison

Neither NTNX nor AMR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AMR Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.57%	4.23%
NTNX Nutanix, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

NTNX vs. AMR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Nutanix, Inc. and Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

NTNX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nutanix, Inc. reported a gross profit of 610.68M and revenue of 703.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.9%.

AMR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 524.99M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

NTNX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nutanix, Inc. reported an operating income of 68.56M and revenue of 703.07M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.8%.

AMR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of -1.59M and revenue of 524.99M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.3%.

NTNX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nutanix, Inc. reported a net income of 72.09M and revenue of 703.07M, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.

AMR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. reported a net income of -11.03M and revenue of 524.99M, resulting in a net margin of -2.1%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NTNX and AMR in my portfolio?

NTNX and AMR have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NTNX or AMR?

AMR has higher volatility (19.30%) compared to NTNX (16.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTNX dropped -80.40% vs AMR's -97.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.