NSTMX vs. GPARX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Short Term Bond Fund (NSTMX) and GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund (GPARX).
NSTMX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Sep 30, 1992. GPARX is managed by GuidePath. It was launched on Apr 29, 2011.
Performance
NSTMX vs. GPARX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NSTMX vs. GPARX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NSTMX Columbia Short Term Bond Fund | 0.03% | 5.95% | 5.45% | 6.97% | -4.82% | 0.73% | 3.42% | 5.20% | 0.62% | 1.04% |
GPARX GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund | 4.77% | 7.42% | 4.20% | 6.87% | -10.82% | 0.75% | 3.92% | 7.47% | -1.64% | 4.50% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NSTMX achieves a 0.03% return, which is significantly lower than GPARX's 4.77% return. Over the past 10 years, NSTMX has underperformed GPARX with an annualized return of 2.49%, while GPARX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.27% annualized return.
NSTMX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.81%
- YTD
- 0.03%
- 6M
- 1.19%
- 1Y
- 4.38%
- 3Y*
- 5.32%
- 5Y*
- 2.71%
- 10Y*
- 2.49%
GPARX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- YTD
- 4.77%
- 6M
- 6.79%
- 1Y
- 10.64%
- 3Y*
- 6.93%
- 5Y*
- 2.54%
- 10Y*
- 3.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NSTMX vs. GPARX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NSTMX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than GPARX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NSTMX vs. GPARX — Risk / Return Rank
NSTMX
GPARX
NSTMX vs. GPARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Short Term Bond Fund (NSTMX) and GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund (GPARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NSTMX | GPARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.61 | 1.65 | +0.96 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.08 | 2.19 | +2.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.71 | 1.36 | +0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.38 | 2.35 | +3.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.18 | 10.80 | +9.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NSTMX | GPARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61 | 1.65 | +0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.25 | 0.52 | +0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.17 | 0.78 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.69 | 0.75 | +0.94 |
Correlation
The correlation between NSTMX and GPARX is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
NSTMX vs. GPARX - Dividend Comparison
NSTMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, more than GPARX's 3.16% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NSTMX Columbia Short Term Bond Fund | 4.30% | 4.73% | 3.84% | 3.71% | 2.11% | 1.53% | 2.32% | 3.45% | 1.42% | 1.44% | 0.89% | 0.84% |
GPARX GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund | 3.16% | 3.31% | 4.99% | 4.81% | 2.42% | 1.99% | 2.45% | 2.76% | 2.27% | 1.60% | 3.17% | 2.15% |
Drawdowns
NSTMX vs. GPARX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NSTMX drawdown since its inception was -9.50%, smaller than the maximum GPARX drawdown of -15.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSTMX and GPARX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NSTMX | GPARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.50% | -15.56% | +6.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.91% | -4.68% | +3.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.06% | -15.56% | +8.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.50% | -15.56% | +6.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -1.46% | +0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.54% | -2.40% | +1.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.24% | 1.02% | -0.78% |
Volatility
NSTMX vs. GPARX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Short Term Bond Fund (NSTMX) is 0.48%, while GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund (GPARX) has a volatility of 2.14%. This indicates that NSTMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NSTMX | GPARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.48% | 2.14% | -1.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.17% | 6.11% | -4.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85% | 6.56% | -4.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.19% | 4.94% | -2.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.13% | 4.23% | -2.10% |