NSTMX vs. CTCAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Short Term Bond Fund (NSTMX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX).
NSTMX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Sep 30, 1992. CTCAX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Nov 9, 2000.
Performance
NSTMX vs. CTCAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NSTMX vs. CTCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NSTMX Columbia Short Term Bond Fund | 0.03% | 5.95% | 5.45% | 6.97% | -4.82% | 0.73% | 3.42% | 5.20% | 0.62% | 1.04% |
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A | -10.22% | 24.78% | 31.39% | 56.46% | -34.81% | 22.73% | 49.46% | 43.91% | -1.48% | 42.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NSTMX achieves a 0.03% return, which is significantly higher than CTCAX's -10.22% return. Over the past 10 years, NSTMX has underperformed CTCAX with an annualized return of 2.49%, while CTCAX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.26% annualized return.
NSTMX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.81%
- YTD
- 0.03%
- 6M
- 1.19%
- 1Y
- 4.38%
- 3Y*
- 5.32%
- 5Y*
- 2.71%
- 10Y*
- 2.49%
CTCAX
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- -9.75%
- YTD
- -10.22%
- 6M
- -8.54%
- 1Y
- 27.76%
- 3Y*
- 23.83%
- 5Y*
- 12.52%
- 10Y*
- 20.26%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NSTMX vs. CTCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NSTMX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than CTCAX's 1.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NSTMX vs. CTCAX — Risk / Return Rank
NSTMX
CTCAX
NSTMX vs. CTCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Short Term Bond Fund (NSTMX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NSTMX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.61 | 1.02 | +1.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.08 | 1.57 | +3.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.71 | 1.22 | +0.49 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.38 | 1.67 | +3.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.18 | 5.92 | +14.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NSTMX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61 | 1.02 | +1.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.25 | 0.49 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.17 | 0.82 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.69 | 0.70 | +0.99 |
Correlation
The correlation between NSTMX and CTCAX is -0.07. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
NSTMX vs. CTCAX - Dividend Comparison
NSTMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, more than CTCAX's 3.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NSTMX Columbia Short Term Bond Fund | 4.30% | 4.73% | 3.84% | 3.71% | 2.11% | 1.53% | 2.32% | 3.45% | 1.42% | 1.44% | 0.89% | 0.84% |
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A | 3.66% | 3.29% | 1.08% | 2.36% | 3.53% | 4.15% | 0.91% | 2.55% | 5.82% | 3.52% | 0.36% | 1.80% |
Drawdowns
NSTMX vs. CTCAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NSTMX drawdown since its inception was -9.50%, smaller than the maximum CTCAX drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSTMX and CTCAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NSTMX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.50% | -61.04% | +51.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.91% | -14.43% | +13.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.06% | -39.55% | +32.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.50% | -39.55% | +30.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -14.43% | +13.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.54% | -10.75% | +10.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.24% | 4.07% | -3.83% |
Volatility
NSTMX vs. CTCAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Short Term Bond Fund (NSTMX) is 0.48%, while Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX) has a volatility of 7.45%. This indicates that NSTMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NSTMX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.48% | 7.45% | -6.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.17% | 16.24% | -15.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85% | 27.00% | -25.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.19% | 25.81% | -23.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.13% | 24.66% | -22.53% |