NSLR vs. ECAT
NSLR (Neostellar Capital Corp.) is a stock, while ECAT (BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust) is Tactical Allocation fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 3 years, NSLR returned 44.02%/yr vs 19.51%/yr for ECAT. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NSLR vs. ECAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NSLR achieves a 18.11% return, which is significantly higher than ECAT's 14.28% return.
NSLR
- 1D
- 3.72%
- 1M
- -15.59%
- 6M
- 19.76%
- YTD
- 18.11%
- 1Y
- 30.79%
- 3Y*
- 44.02%
- 5Y*
- 6.54%
- 10Y*
- 15.39%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.72%
ECAT
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 1.98%
- 6M
- 12.66%
- YTD
- 14.28%
- 1Y
- 17.93%
- 3Y*
- 19.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.53%
NSLR vs. ECAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NSLR Neostellar Capital Corp. | 18.11% | 69.91% | 49.24% | 3.68% | -70.31% | 21.07% |
ECAT BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust | 14.28% | 16.64% | 19.96% | 32.36% | -21.90% | -6.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between NSLR and ECAT is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2021 | 0.38 |
The correlation between NSLR and ECAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (3 years) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NSLR vs. ECAT — Risk / Return Rank
NSLR
ECAT
NSLR vs. ECAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neostellar Capital Corp. (NSLR) and BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NSLR | ECAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.23 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | 1.53 | -0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.81 | 5.66 | -1.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NSLR vs. ECAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NSLR drawdown since its inception was -77.81%, which is greater than ECAT's maximum drawdown of -32.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSLR and ECAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NSLR | ECAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.81% | -32.23% | -45.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.59% | -11.80% | -19.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.03% | -15.79% | -17.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.22% | -0.96% | -24.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.94% | -8.89% | -38.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.13% | 3.17% | +4.96% |
Volatility
NSLR vs. ECAT - Volatility Comparison
Neostellar Capital Corp. (NSLR) has a higher volatility of 15.19% compared to BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT) at 3.48%. This indicates that NSLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NSLR | ECAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.19% | 3.48% | +11.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.36% | 11.08% | +24.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.91% | 13.90% | +30.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.47% | 16.82% | +30.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.74% | 16.82% | +29.92% |
Dividends
NSLR vs. ECAT - Dividend Comparison
NSLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, less than ECAT's 21.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECAT BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust | 21.57% | 23.00% | 17.44% | 9.14% | 8.94% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NSLR Neostellar Capital Corp. | 2.24% | 5.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.89% | 61.78% | 6.65% | 4.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 55.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NSLR and ECAT have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NSLR has higher volatility (15.19%) compared to ECAT (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSLR dropped -77.81% vs ECAT's -32.23%.
ECAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NSLR and ECAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer