NSLR vs. BLK
NSLR (Neostellar Capital Corp.) and BLK (BlackRock, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, NSLR returned 15.39%/yr vs 13.86%/yr for BLK. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NSLR vs. BLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NSLR achieves a 18.11% return, which is significantly higher than BLK's -1.91% return. Over the past 10 years, NSLR has outperformed BLK with an annualized return of 15.39%, while BLK has yielded a comparatively lower 13.86% annualized return.
NSLR
- 1D
- 3.72%
- 1M
- -15.59%
- 6M
- 19.76%
- YTD
- 18.11%
- 1Y
- 30.79%
- 3Y*
- 44.02%
- 5Y*
- 6.54%
- 10Y*
- 15.39%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.72%
BLK
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- 6M
- -5.42%
- YTD
- -1.91%
- 1Y
- -3.02%
- 3Y*
- 13.98%
- 5Y*
- 6.20%
- 10Y*
- 13.86%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.75%
NSLR vs. BLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NSLR Neostellar Capital Corp. | 18.11% | 69.91% | 49.24% | 3.68% | -70.31% | 72.61% | 116.63% | 31.56% | -4.22% | 8.35% |
BLK BlackRock, Inc. | -1.91% | 6.55% | 29.29% | 17.86% | -20.40% | 29.39% | 47.21% | 31.87% | -21.59% | 38.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between NSLR and BLK is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2011 | 0.27 |
Fundamentals
NSLR:
$290.68M
BLK:
$160.92B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NSLR vs. BLK — Risk / Return Rank
NSLR
BLK
NSLR vs. BLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neostellar Capital Corp. (NSLR) and BlackRock, Inc. (BLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NSLR | BLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.00 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | -0.14 | +1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.81 | -0.28 | +4.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NSLR vs. BLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NSLR drawdown since its inception was -77.81%, which is greater than BLK's maximum drawdown of -60.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSLR and BLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NSLR | BLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.81% | -60.36% | -17.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.59% | -22.45% | -9.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.03% | -23.74% | -9.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.81% | -43.90% | -33.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.81% | -43.90% | -33.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.22% | -12.27% | -12.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.94% | -11.93% | -35.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.13% | 10.97% | -2.84% |
Volatility
NSLR vs. BLK - Volatility Comparison
Neostellar Capital Corp. (NSLR) has a higher volatility of 15.19% compared to BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) at 10.30%. This indicates that NSLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NSLR | BLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.19% | 10.30% | +4.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.36% | 21.28% | +14.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.91% | 26.44% | +17.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.47% | 26.88% | +20.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.74% | 27.75% | +18.99% |
Dividends
NSLR vs. BLK - Dividend Comparison
NSLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than BLK's 2.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLK BlackRock, Inc. | 2.11% | 1.95% | 1.99% | 2.46% | 2.75% | 1.80% | 2.01% | 2.63% | 3.08% | 1.95% | 2.41% | 2.56% |
NSLR Neostellar Capital Corp. | 2.24% | 5.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.89% | 61.78% | 6.65% | 4.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 55.67% | 0.00% |
Financials
NSLR vs. BLK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Neostellar Capital Corp. and BlackRock, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
NSLR and BLK have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NSLR has higher volatility (15.19%) compared to BLK (10.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSLR dropped -77.81% vs BLK's -60.36%.
NSLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NSLR and BLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer