PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NSGRX vs. FNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NSGRX vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Small Cap Core Fund (NSGRX) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NSGRX achieves a 20.56% return, which is significantly higher than FNDX's 14.31% return. Over the past 10 years, NSGRX has underperformed FNDX with an annualized return of 11.58%, while FNDX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.48% annualized return.


NSGRX

1D
0.87%
1M
4.82%
YTD
20.56%
6M
18.41%
1Y
38.28%
3Y*
18.50%
5Y*
8.06%
10Y*
11.58%

FNDX

1D
-0.42%
1M
0.52%
YTD
14.31%
6M
13.73%
1Y
30.33%
3Y*
20.33%
5Y*
13.24%
10Y*
14.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NSGRX vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NSGRX
Northern Small Cap Core Fund
20.56%10.57%10.44%16.96%-16.14%19.99%14.53%23.30%-10.22%13.05%
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
14.31%16.94%16.77%18.23%-6.92%31.73%9.12%28.65%-7.30%17.12%

Correlation

The correlation between NSGRX and FNDX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013

0.86

The correlation between NSGRX and FNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NSGRX vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NSGRX
NSGRX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
NSGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
NSGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDX
FNDX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NSGRX vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Small Cap Core Fund (NSGRX) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NSGRXFNDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.53

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.67

5.02

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.35

19.42

-3.07

NSGRX vs. FNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NSGRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the FNDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NSGRX and FNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NSGRX vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NSGRX drawdown since its inception was -64.89%, which is greater than FNDX's maximum drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSGRX and FNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NSGRXFNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.89%

-37.72%

-27.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.66%

-6.06%

-2.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.45%

-16.30%

-10.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.31%

-19.06%

-13.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.37%

-37.72%

-2.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.43%

+1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.13%

-3.55%

-18.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

1.57%

+0.89%

Volatility

NSGRX vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison

Northern Small Cap Core Fund (NSGRX) has a higher volatility of 5.51% compared to Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) at 3.33%. This indicates that NSGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NSGRXFNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.51%

3.33%

+2.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.07%

7.63%

+5.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.56%

10.47%

+8.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.41%

15.18%

+8.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.42%

17.48%

+5.94%

NSGRX vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NSGRX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

NSGRX vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison

NSGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.15%, more than FNDX's 1.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
1.45%1.63%1.76%1.82%2.07%1.64%2.29%2.23%2.40%1.86%2.01%2.01%
NSGRX
Northern Small Cap Core Fund
13.15%15.85%17.77%6.90%0.55%15.75%5.00%6.30%1.26%4.35%0.67%3.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


NSGRX and FNDX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NSGRX has higher volatility (5.51%) compared to FNDX (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSGRX dropped -64.89% vs FNDX's -37.72%.

FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NSGRX and FNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer