PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NSDVX vs. UBVSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NSDVX vs. UBVSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in North Star Dividend Fund (NSDVX) and JPMorgan Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund Class I (UBVSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NSDVX achieves a 22.08% return, which is significantly higher than UBVSX's 14.13% return. Over the past 10 years, NSDVX has underperformed UBVSX with an annualized return of 7.16%, while UBVSX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.62% annualized return.


NSDVX

1D
-0.54%
1M
0.07%
6M
13.21%
YTD
22.08%
1Y
28.73%
3Y*
10.76%
5Y*
5.81%
10Y*
7.16%
ALL TIME*
8.05%

UBVSX

1D
-0.63%
1M
-0.20%
6M
8.48%
YTD
14.13%
1Y
19.90%
3Y*
11.26%
5Y*
9.78%
10Y*
10.62%
ALL TIME*
9.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NSDVX vs. UBVSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NSDVX
North Star Dividend Fund
22.08%-1.31%9.25%8.06%-6.36%16.16%6.51%16.13%-12.35%8.27%
UBVSX
JPMorgan Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund Class I
14.13%1.70%13.03%14.59%-1.26%34.05%3.35%23.11%-15.37%13.26%

Correlation

The correlation between NSDVX and UBVSX is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.83

The correlation between NSDVX and UBVSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NSDVX vs. UBVSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NSDVX
NSDVX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
NSDVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSDVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSDVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
NSDVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSDVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

UBVSX
UBVSX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
UBVSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBVSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBVSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
UBVSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBVSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NSDVX vs. UBVSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North Star Dividend Fund (NSDVX) and JPMorgan Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund Class I (UBVSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NSDVXUBVSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.19

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

1.70

+0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.60

4.84

+2.76

NSDVX vs. UBVSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NSDVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the UBVSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NSDVX and UBVSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NSDVX vs. UBVSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NSDVX drawdown since its inception was -38.64%, smaller than the maximum UBVSX drawdown of -52.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSDVX and UBVSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NSDVXUBVSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.64%

-52.19%

+13.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.48%

-10.36%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.41%

-21.48%

+5.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.27%

-21.48%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.64%

-52.19%

+13.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.21%

-3.03%

+0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.48%

-6.21%

-0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

3.62%

-0.12%

Volatility

NSDVX vs. UBVSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for North Star Dividend Fund (NSDVX) is 3.73%, while JPMorgan Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund Class I (UBVSX) has a volatility of 5.24%. This indicates that NSDVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UBVSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NSDVXUBVSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

5.24%

-1.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.54%

11.19%

-1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.68%

16.59%

-1.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.02%

20.11%

-4.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.75%

24.57%

-6.82%

NSDVX vs. UBVSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NSDVX has a 1.37% expense ratio, which is higher than UBVSX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

NSDVX vs. UBVSX - Dividend Comparison

NSDVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, less than UBVSX's 8.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NSDVX
North Star Dividend Fund
2.75%3.45%7.00%2.52%6.57%3.31%1.52%2.64%6.87%2.48%4.67%3.51%
UBVSX
JPMorgan Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund Class I
8.20%9.35%7.36%8.30%8.89%3.34%0.90%4.85%11.46%4.53%3.11%3.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


NSDVX and UBVSX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UBVSX has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to NSDVX (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSDVX dropped -38.64% vs UBVSX's -52.19%.

NSDVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NSDVX and UBVSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer