NSDVX vs. PZVSX
NSDVX (North Star Dividend Fund) and PZVSX (Pzena Small Cap Value Fund) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, NSDVX returned 4.64%/yr vs 6.75%/yr for PZVSX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NSDVX charges 1.37%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for PZVSX.
Performance
NSDVX vs. PZVSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NSDVX achieves a 17.74% return, which is significantly higher than PZVSX's 16.34% return.
NSDVX
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 17.74%
- 6M
- 16.64%
- 1Y
- 21.28%
- 3Y*
- 12.02%
- 5Y*
- 4.64%
- 10Y*
- 7.34%
PZVSX
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- 3.59%
- YTD
- 16.34%
- 6M
- 15.10%
- 1Y
- 23.59%
- 3Y*
- 11.40%
- 5Y*
- 6.75%
- 10Y*
- —
NSDVX vs. PZVSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NSDVX North Star Dividend Fund | 17.74% | -1.31% | 9.25% | 8.06% | -6.36% | 16.16% | 6.51% | 16.13% | -12.35% | 8.27% |
PZVSX Pzena Small Cap Value Fund | 16.34% | -4.94% | 1.62% | 25.62% | -5.33% | 27.93% | -0.09% | 24.84% | -15.19% | 2.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between NSDVX and PZVSX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.84 |
The correlation between NSDVX and PZVSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NSDVX vs. PZVSX — Risk / Return Rank
NSDVX
PZVSX
NSDVX vs. PZVSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North Star Dividend Fund (NSDVX) and Pzena Small Cap Value Fund (PZVSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NSDVX | PZVSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.21 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | 1.68 | +0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.53 | 4.19 | +2.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NSDVX vs. PZVSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NSDVX drawdown since its inception was -38.64%, smaller than the maximum PZVSX drawdown of -54.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSDVX and PZVSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NSDVX | PZVSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.64% | -54.22% | +15.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.48% | -15.26% | +4.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.41% | -32.43% | +16.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.27% | -32.43% | +11.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | -3.66% | +2.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.52% | -10.44% | +3.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.57% | 6.10% | -2.53% |
Volatility
NSDVX vs. PZVSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for North Star Dividend Fund (NSDVX) is 4.25%, while Pzena Small Cap Value Fund (PZVSX) has a volatility of 5.31%. This indicates that NSDVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PZVSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NSDVX | PZVSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.25% | 5.31% | -1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.60% | 14.83% | -5.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.93% | 22.17% | -7.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.06% | 24.25% | -8.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.72% | 27.44% | -9.72% |
NSDVX vs. PZVSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NSDVX has a 1.37% expense ratio, which is lower than PZVSX's 1.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
NSDVX vs. PZVSX - Dividend Comparison
NSDVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, more than PZVSX's 2.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NSDVX North Star Dividend Fund | 2.83% | 3.45% | 7.00% | 2.52% | 6.57% | 3.31% | 1.52% | 2.64% | 6.87% | 2.48% | 4.67% | 3.51% |
PZVSX Pzena Small Cap Value Fund | 2.00% | 2.33% | 7.03% | 0.45% | 17.31% | 1.25% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 4.56% | 7.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NSDVX and PZVSX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PZVSX has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to NSDVX (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSDVX dropped -38.64% vs PZVSX's -54.22%.
NSDVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NSDVX and PZVSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer