NSCR vs. PSCX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NSCR (Nuveen Sustainable Core ETF) and PSCX (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NSCR returned 7.29% vs 15.49% for PSCX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NSCR charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PSCX.

Performance

NSCR vs. PSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Sustainable Core ETF (NSCR) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NSCR achieves a -6.24% return, which is significantly lower than PSCX's 5.11% return.

NSCR

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: -6.24%
• 6M: -6.10%
• 1Y: 7.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PSCX

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 2.00%
• YTD: 5.11%
• 6M: 5.98%
• 1Y: 15.49%
• 3Y*: 12.85%
• 5Y*: 8.46%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NSCR vs. PSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NSCR Nuveen Sustainable Core ETF	-6.24%	13.32%	12.92%
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF	5.11%	12.08%	9.42%

Correlation

The correlation between NSCR and PSCX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024	0.84

The correlation between NSCR and PSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

NSCR vs. PSCX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NSCR	PSCX
Technology	28.8%	33.2%
Financial Services	19.6%	12.5%
Consumer Cyclical	12.1%	10.0%
Healthcare	10.5%	9.6%
Communication Services	9.0%	10.3%
Industrials	5.6%	8.4%
Energy	4.3%	4.2%
Utilities	3.8%	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	2.0%	5.4%
Basic Materials	1.4%	1.9%
Real Estate	1.3%	2.0%

Return for Risk

NSCR vs. PSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NSCR

NSCR Risk / Return Rank: 18
NSCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
NSCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
NSCR Omega Ratio Rank: 20
NSCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
NSCR Martin Ratio Rank: 18

PSCX

PSCX Risk / Return Rank: 85
PSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
PSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
PSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
PSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
PSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NSCR vs. PSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Sustainable Core ETF (NSCR) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NSCR	PSCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.62	2.82	-2.20
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.93	4.22	-3.29
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.58	-0.46
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.62	3.70	-3.08
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.70	18.94	-17.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NSCR vs. PSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NSCR Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the PSCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NSCR and PSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NSCR	PSCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62	2.82	-2.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.20	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	1.27	-0.74

Drawdowns

NSCR vs. PSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NSCR drawdown since its inception was -20.75%, which is greater than PSCX's maximum drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSCR and PSCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NSCR	PSCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.75%	-10.20%	-10.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.81%	-4.20%	-7.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.61%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-10.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.98%	-0.12%	-7.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.33%	-1.87%	-1.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.29%	0.82%	+3.47%

Volatility

NSCR vs. PSCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Sustainable Core ETF (NSCR) is 0.00%, while Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) has a volatility of 0.89%. This indicates that NSCR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NSCR	PSCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	0.89%	-0.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.25%	4.21%	+4.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.81%	5.53%	+6.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.97%	7.07%	+8.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.97%	6.96%	+9.01%

NSCR vs. PSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NSCR has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCX's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

NSCR vs. PSCX - Dividend Comparison

NSCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.34%, while PSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
NSCR Nuveen Sustainable Core ETF	16.34%	1.92%	1.57%
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NSCR and PSCX in my portfolio?

NSCR and PSCX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NSCR or PSCX?

PSCX has higher volatility (0.89%) compared to NSCR (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSCR dropped -20.75% vs PSCX's -10.20%.

Which ETF is better, NSCR or PSCX?

On 1-year performance, PSCX leads with 15.49% vs 7.29% for NSCR. On fees, NSCR is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, NSCR has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NSCR or PSCX?

Over the 1-year period, PSCX has performed better with a 15.49% return vs 7.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NSCR or PSCX?

NSCR is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSCX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NSCR or PSCX?

NSCR has the higher dividend yield at 16.34%, compared with 0.00% for PSCX.

What is the main difference between NSCR and PSCX?

They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for NSCR and 0.75% for PSCX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.