PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NSCR vs. NURE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NSCR vs. NURE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Sustainable Core ETF (NSCR) and Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NSCR vs. NURE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NSCR
Nuveen Sustainable Core ETF
-7.53%13.32%12.92%
NURE
Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF
-2.11%-7.51%8.10%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NSCR achieves a -7.53% return, which is significantly lower than NURE's -2.11% return.


NSCR

1D
2.92%
1M
-5.86%
YTD
-7.53%
6M
-5.35%
1Y
11.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NURE

1D
0.94%
1M
-6.68%
YTD
-2.11%
6M
-3.10%
1Y
-8.77%
3Y*
1.13%
5Y*
1.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NSCR vs. NURE - Expense Ratio Comparison

NSCR has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than NURE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NSCR vs. NURE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NSCR
NSCR Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
NSCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSCR Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
NSCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSCR Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

NURE
NURE Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
NURE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NURE Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
NURE Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
NURE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
NURE Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NSCR vs. NURE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Sustainable Core ETF (NSCR) and Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NSCRNUREDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.61

-0.45

+1.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.00

-0.53

+1.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

0.94

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

-0.56

+1.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.68

-1.20

+4.88

NSCR vs. NURE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NSCR Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is higher than the NURE Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NSCR and NURE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NSCRNUREDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

-0.45

+1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.21

+0.31

Correlation

The correlation between NSCR and NURE is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

NSCR vs. NURE - Dividend Comparison

NSCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, less than NURE's 5.08% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
NSCR
Nuveen Sustainable Core ETF
2.07%1.92%1.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NURE
Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF
5.08%4.56%3.51%3.73%2.80%1.34%3.41%3.28%4.11%3.86%0.48%

Drawdowns

NSCR vs. NURE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NSCR drawdown since its inception was -20.75%, smaller than the maximum NURE drawdown of -46.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSCR and NURE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NSCRNUREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.75%

-46.05%

+25.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.47%

-14.10%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.24%

-22.83%

+13.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.93%

-12.23%

+9.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

6.52%

-3.14%

Volatility

NSCR vs. NURE - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Sustainable Core ETF (NSCR) has a higher volatility of 5.53% compared to Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE) at 4.58%. This indicates that NSCR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NURE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NSCRNUREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.53%

4.58%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.20%

10.91%

-0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.11%

19.42%

-0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.63%

19.58%

-2.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.63%

21.89%

-5.26%