PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NRSDY vs. CRUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NRSDY vs. CRUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nordic Semiconductor ASA (NRSDY) and Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRSDY achieves a 53.44% return, which is significantly higher than CRUS's 39.59% return.


NRSDY

1D
0.00%
1M
-9.89%
YTD
53.44%
6M
53.44%
1Y
53.44%
3Y*
18.21%
5Y*
-7.72%
10Y*

CRUS

1D
0.07%
1M
-3.37%
YTD
39.59%
6M
37.21%
1Y
58.53%
3Y*
30.86%
5Y*
15.89%
10Y*
15.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NRSDY vs. CRUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NRSDY
Nordic Semiconductor ASA
53.44%47.95%-29.86%-30.93%-46.55%11.18%
CRUS
Cirrus Logic, Inc.
39.59%19.00%19.70%11.69%-19.06%18.52%

Correlation

The correlation between NRSDY and CRUS is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2021

0.16

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NRSDY:

$3.89B

CRUS:

$8.66B

EPS

NRSDY:

$0.13

CRUS:

$7.84

PE Ratio

NRSDY:

148.51

CRUS:

21.10

PEG Ratio

NRSDY:

3.52

CRUS:

0.93

PS Ratio

NRSDY:

5.45

CRUS:

4.38

PB Ratio

NRSDY:

5.71

CRUS:

4.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

NRSDY:

$704.87M

CRUS:

$2.00B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NRSDY:

$305.30M

CRUS:

$1.05B

EBITDA (TTM)

NRSDY:

$63.62M

CRUS:

$503.58M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NRSDY vs. CRUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRSDY
NRSDY Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
NRSDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRSDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRSDY Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
NRSDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRSDY Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

CRUS
CRUS Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
CRUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
CRUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NRSDY vs. CRUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nordic Semiconductor ASA (NRSDY) and Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NRSDYCRUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.29

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

3.69

-1.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.38

9.27

-5.89

NRSDY vs. CRUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NRSDY Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the CRUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRSDY and CRUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NRSDY vs. CRUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRSDY drawdown since its inception was -79.75%, smaller than the maximum CRUS drawdown of -97.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRSDY and CRUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NRSDYCRUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.75%

-97.48%

+17.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.21%

-15.94%

-13.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.55%

-46.85%

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-79.75%

-46.85%

-32.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.59%

-7.54%

-39.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.40%

-52.69%

-2.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.97%

6.33%

+9.64%

Volatility

NRSDY vs. CRUS - Volatility Comparison

Nordic Semiconductor ASA (NRSDY) has a higher volatility of 19.57% compared to Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) at 12.95%. This indicates that NRSDY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NRSDYCRUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.57%

12.95%

+6.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.56%

26.39%

+13.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.22%

35.78%

+15.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.03%

36.28%

+27.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.83%

40.26%

+23.57%

Dividends

NRSDY vs. CRUS - Dividend Comparison

Neither NRSDY nor CRUS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

NRSDY vs. CRUS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nordic Semiconductor ASA and Cirrus Logic, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M20222023202420252026
192.44M
448.52M
(NRSDY) Total Revenue
(CRUS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NRSDY vs. CRUS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Nordic Semiconductor ASA and Cirrus Logic, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
52.1%
53.0%
Portfolio components
NRSDY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nordic Semiconductor ASA reported a gross profit of 100.29M and revenue of 192.44M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.1%.

CRUS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cirrus Logic, Inc. reported a gross profit of 237.64M and revenue of 448.52M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.0%.

NRSDY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nordic Semiconductor ASA reported an operating income of 10.44M and revenue of 192.44M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.4%.

CRUS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cirrus Logic, Inc. reported an operating income of 90.30M and revenue of 448.52M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.

NRSDY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nordic Semiconductor ASA reported a net income of 10.63M and revenue of 192.44M, resulting in a net margin of 5.5%.

CRUS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cirrus Logic, Inc. reported a net income of 81.81M and revenue of 448.52M, resulting in a net margin of 18.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NRSDY and CRUS have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NRSDY has higher volatility (19.57%) compared to CRUS (12.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NRSDY dropped -79.75% vs CRUS's -97.48%.

CRUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NRSDY and CRUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer