PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NRP vs. ARLP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NRP vs. ARLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Natural Resource Partners L.P. (NRP) and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRP achieves a 2.96% return, which is significantly lower than ARLP's 14.82% return. Over the past 10 years, NRP has outperformed ARLP with an annualized return of 34.01%, while ARLP has yielded a comparatively lower 15.08% annualized return.


NRP

1D
-2.93%
1M
-9.98%
YTD
2.96%
6M
1.44%
1Y
13.67%
3Y*
38.12%
5Y*
48.62%
10Y*
34.01%

ARLP

1D
-0.35%
1M
-1.06%
YTD
14.82%
6M
12.17%
1Y
7.68%
3Y*
25.72%
5Y*
45.72%
10Y*
15.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NRP vs. ARLP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NRP
Natural Resource Partners L.P.
2.96%-1.93%27.43%87.03%72.85%164.73%-25.28%-43.26%55.86%-14.50%
ARLP
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.
14.82%-2.45%39.91%18.83%73.34%195.75%-56.80%-28.90%-1.90%-4.04%

Correlation

The correlation between NRP and ARLP is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2002

0.37

The correlation between NRP and ARLP shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (10 years) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

NRP:

$9.53

ARLP:

$72.64

PE Ratio

NRP:

11.12

ARLP:

0.35

PEG Ratio

NRP:

0.71

ARLP:

0.01

PS Ratio

NRP:

5.74

ARLP:

0.01

Total Revenue (TTM)

NRP:

$184.53M

ARLP:

$517.67B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NRP:

$128.91M

ARLP:

$353.56M

EBITDA (TTM)

NRP:

$140.60M

ARLP:

$82.91B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NRP vs. ARLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRP
NRP Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
NRP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRP Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
NRP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRP Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

ARLP
ARLP Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
ARLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARLP Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
ARLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARLP Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NRP vs. ARLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natural Resource Partners L.P. (NRP) and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NRPARLPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.08

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.75

0.44

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.60

0.83

+1.77

NRP vs. ARLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NRP Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is higher than the ARLP Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRP and ARLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NRPARLPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

0.34

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.41

1.36

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.30

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.37

-0.19

Drawdowns

NRP vs. ARLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRP drawdown since its inception was -97.11%, which is greater than ARLP's maximum drawdown of -90.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRP and ARLP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NRPARLPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.11%

-90.52%

-6.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.22%

-17.62%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.74%

-20.83%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.24%

-29.13%

+3.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.75%

-85.26%

+6.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.88%

-10.24%

-4.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.53%

-24.34%

-19.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.27%

9.28%

-4.01%

Volatility

NRP vs. ARLP - Volatility Comparison

Natural Resource Partners L.P. (NRP) has a higher volatility of 7.48% compared to Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP) at 5.78%. This indicates that NRP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NRPARLPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.48%

5.78%

+1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.13%

15.70%

-0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.10%

22.63%

-2.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.78%

33.82%

+0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.24%

50.24%

-7.00%

Dividends

NRP vs. ARLP - Dividend Comparison

NRP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, less than ARLP's 9.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARLP
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.
9.45%11.19%10.65%13.22%7.38%3.16%8.93%19.82%11.94%9.54%8.85%19.74%
NRP
Natural Resource Partners L.P.
2.94%4.03%4.90%5.87%4.97%5.39%9.82%13.18%4.71%6.92%5.57%45.28%

Financials

NRP vs. ARLP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Natural Resource Partners L.P. and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00B200.00B300.00B400.00B500.00B20222023202420252026
39.35M
516.02B
(NRP) Total Revenue
(ARLP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NRP vs. ARLP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Natural Resource Partners L.P. and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%2022202320242025202600
Portfolio components
NRP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Natural Resource Partners L.P. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 39.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ARLP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 516.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

NRP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Natural Resource Partners L.P. reported an operating income of 20.59M and revenue of 39.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 52.3%.

ARLP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported an operating income of 21.86B and revenue of 516.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.

NRP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Natural Resource Partners L.P. reported a net income of 392.00K and revenue of 39.35M, resulting in a net margin of 1.0%.

ARLP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported a net income of 9.09B and revenue of 516.02B, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NRP and ARLP have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NRP has higher volatility (7.48%) compared to ARLP (5.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NRP dropped -97.11% vs ARLP's -90.52%.

NRP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NRP and ARLP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer