PortfoliosLab logo
NRP vs. ARLP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between NRP and ARLP is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

NRP vs. ARLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Natural Resource Partners L.P. (NRP) and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NRP:

0.40

ARLP:

0.82

Sortino Ratio

NRP:

0.84

ARLP:

1.18

Omega Ratio

NRP:

1.11

ARLP:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

NRP:

0.41

ARLP:

1.47

Martin Ratio

NRP:

1.93

ARLP:

3.47

Ulcer Index

NRP:

7.00%

ARLP:

6.03%

Daily Std Dev

NRP:

35.66%

ARLP:

26.50%

Max Drawdown

NRP:

-97.12%

ARLP:

-90.52%

Current Drawdown

NRP:

-17.77%

ARLP:

-6.26%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NRP:

$1.29B

ARLP:

$3.34B

EPS

NRP:

$10.49

ARLP:

$2.13

PE Ratio

NRP:

9.34

ARLP:

12.22

PEG Ratio

NRP:

0.00

ARLP:

-1.04

PS Ratio

NRP:

5.60

ARLP:

1.43

PB Ratio

NRP:

2.28

ARLP:

1.85

Total Revenue (TTM)

NRP:

$229.91M

ARLP:

$2.34B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NRP:

$207.45M

ARLP:

$1.39B

EBITDA (TTM)

NRP:

$197.29M

ARLP:

$138.81B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRP achieves a -9.27% return, which is significantly lower than ARLP's 4.25% return. Over the past 10 years, NRP has outperformed ARLP with an annualized return of 17.53%, while ARLP has yielded a comparatively lower 8.51% annualized return.


NRP

YTD

-9.27%

1M

-3.58%

6M

-8.02%

1Y

13.23%

3Y*

36.57%

5Y*

58.57%

10Y*

17.53%

ARLP

YTD

4.25%

1M

1.22%

6M

-2.91%

1Y

17.66%

3Y*

22.63%

5Y*

65.88%

10Y*

8.51%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Natural Resource Partners L.P.

Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NRP vs. ARLP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NRP is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NRP is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NRP is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NRP is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NRP is 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NRP is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

ARLP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ARLP is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ARLP is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ARLP is 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ARLP is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ARLP is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ARLP is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NRP vs. ARLP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natural Resource Partners L.P. (NRP) and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current NRP Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the ARLP Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRP and ARLP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

NRP vs. ARLP - Dividend Comparison

NRP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, less than ARLP's 10.76% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NRP
Natural Resource Partners L.P.
4.30%4.90%5.87%4.97%5.39%9.82%8.95%4.71%6.92%5.57%45.28%15.14%
ARLP
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.
10.76%10.65%13.22%7.38%3.16%8.93%19.82%11.94%9.54%8.85%19.74%5.74%

Drawdowns

NRP vs. ARLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRP drawdown since its inception was -97.12%, which is greater than ARLP's maximum drawdown of -90.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRP and ARLP.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

NRP vs. ARLP - Volatility Comparison

Natural Resource Partners L.P. (NRP) and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP) have volatilities of 7.05% and 7.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

NRP vs. ARLP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Natural Resource Partners L.P. and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20212022202320242025
55.68M
540.47M
(NRP) Total Revenue
(ARLP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NRP vs. ARLP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Natural Resource Partners L.P. and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
100.0%
(NRP) Gross Margin
(ARLP) Gross Margin
NRP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Natural Resource Partners L.P. reported a gross profit of 55.68M and revenue of 55.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

ARLP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported a gross profit of 540.47M and revenue of 540.47M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

NRP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Natural Resource Partners L.P. reported an operating income of 42.92M and revenue of 55.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 77.1%.

ARLP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported an operating income of 94.28M and revenue of 540.47M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.4%.

NRP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Natural Resource Partners L.P. reported a net income of 40.25M and revenue of 55.68M, resulting in a net margin of 72.3%.

ARLP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported a net income of 73.98M and revenue of 540.47M, resulting in a net margin of 13.7%.