PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NRO vs. PRRSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NRO vs. PRRSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Real Estate Securities Income Fund (NRO) and PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRO achieves a 0.63% return, which is significantly lower than PRRSX's 12.29% return. Over the past 10 years, NRO has underperformed PRRSX with an annualized return of 4.84%, while PRRSX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.58% annualized return.


NRO

1D
-0.85%
1M
-2.48%
YTD
0.63%
6M
2.04%
1Y
1.15%
3Y*
13.80%
5Y*
0.86%
10Y*
4.84%

PRRSX

1D
0.57%
1M
-0.89%
YTD
12.29%
6M
10.24%
1Y
16.29%
3Y*
11.03%
5Y*
3.76%
10Y*
6.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NRO vs. PRRSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NRO
Neuberger Berman Real Estate Securities Income Fund
0.63%0.85%23.87%15.24%-35.04%29.26%-10.88%47.57%-16.37%13.29%
PRRSX
PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund
12.29%5.21%5.11%12.30%-29.37%53.74%-3.80%29.61%-6.42%4.32%

Correlation

The correlation between NRO and PRRSX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2003

0.68

The correlation between NRO and PRRSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NRO vs. PRRSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRO
NRO Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
NRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRO Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
NRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRO Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

PRRSX
PRRSX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PRRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
PRRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NRO vs. PRRSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Real Estate Securities Income Fund (NRO) and PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NROPRRSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.19

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.10

1.73

-1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.27

5.95

-5.68

NRO vs. PRRSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NRO Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the PRRSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRO and PRRSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NROPRRSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

1.10

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.19

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

0.30

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.35

-0.24

Drawdowns

NRO vs. PRRSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRO drawdown since its inception was -92.91%, which is greater than PRRSX's maximum drawdown of -77.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRO and PRRSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NROPRRSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.91%

-77.82%

-15.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.61%

-9.05%

-2.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.78%

-17.77%

-7.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.35%

-37.14%

-5.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.59%

-45.75%

-16.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.81%

-3.11%

-7.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.21%

-13.09%

-14.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.29%

2.62%

+1.67%

Volatility

NRO vs. PRRSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Real Estate Securities Income Fund (NRO) is 3.95%, while PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX) has a volatility of 4.33%. This indicates that NRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRRSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NROPRRSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

4.33%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.17%

10.18%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.44%

14.26%

-0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.58%

20.20%

+1.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.34%

21.87%

+4.47%

Dividends

NRO vs. PRRSX - Dividend Comparison

NRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.89%, more than PRRSX's 0.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NRO
Neuberger Berman Real Estate Securities Income Fund
12.89%12.27%10.55%11.74%11.96%7.10%10.88%8.60%12.77%9.31%7.64%7.19%
PRRSX
PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund
0.79%2.19%0.61%0.00%18.62%34.01%7.21%7.99%0.81%1.67%0.66%8.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


NRO and PRRSX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRRSX has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to NRO (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NRO dropped -92.91% vs PRRSX's -77.82%.

PRRSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NRO and PRRSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer