NRO vs. RA
NRO (Neuberger Berman Real Estate Securities Income Fund) and RA (Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc.) are both mutual funds - NRO is a REIT fund actively managed by Neuberger Berman, while RA is a Multisector Bonds fund managed by Brookfield. Over the past 5 years, NRO returned 1.16%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for RA. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NRO vs. RA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NRO achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than RA's 3.13% return.
NRO
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -2.61%
- YTD
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 2.92%
- 1Y
- 3.30%
- 3Y*
- 14.13%
- 5Y*
- 1.16%
- 10Y*
- 4.93%
RA
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- YTD
- 3.13%
- 6M
- 2.56%
- 1Y
- 10.02%
- 3Y*
- 2.48%
- 5Y*
- 0.96%
- 10Y*
- —
NRO vs. RA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRO Neuberger Berman Real Estate Securities Income Fund | 1.50% | 0.85% | 23.87% | 15.24% | -35.04% | 29.26% | -10.88% | 47.57% | -16.37% | 13.29% |
RA Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. | 3.13% | 8.32% | 15.87% | -9.02% | -13.47% | 32.35% | -4.17% | 24.89% | -9.15% | 15.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between NRO and RA is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2016 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NRO vs. RA — Risk / Return Rank
NRO
RA
NRO vs. RA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Real Estate Securities Income Fund (NRO) and Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. (RA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NRO | RA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.25 | 1.19 | -0.95 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.43 | 1.78 | -1.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.23 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | 1.48 | -1.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.47 | 4.31 | -3.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NRO | RA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 | 1.19 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.28 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
NRO vs. RA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NRO drawdown since its inception was -92.91%, which is greater than RA's maximum drawdown of -50.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRO and RA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NRO | RA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.91% | -50.66% | -42.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.61% | -6.73% | -4.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.78% | -28.42% | +3.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.35% | -30.83% | -11.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.04% | -3.42% | -6.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.21% | -8.09% | -19.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.28% | 2.31% | +1.97% |
Volatility
NRO vs. RA - Volatility Comparison
Neuberger Berman Real Estate Securities Income Fund (NRO) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. (RA) at 2.28%. This indicates that NRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NRO | RA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.97% | 2.28% | +1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.18% | 6.62% | +3.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.47% | 8.42% | +5.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.58% | 17.60% | +3.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.34% | 20.66% | +5.68% |
Dividends
NRO vs. RA - Dividend Comparison
NRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.78%, more than RA's 11.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRO Neuberger Berman Real Estate Securities Income Fund | 12.78% | 12.27% | 10.55% | 11.74% | 11.96% | 7.10% | 10.88% | 8.60% | 12.77% | 9.31% | 7.64% | 7.19% |
RA Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. | 11.09% | 10.93% | 10.63% | 16.74% | 14.79% | 11.31% | 13.39% | 11.19% | 12.52% | 10.22% | 0.89% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NRO and RA have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NRO has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to RA (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NRO dropped -92.91% vs RA's -50.66%.
RA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NRO and RA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer