NRMGX vs. VMGMX
NRMGX (Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6) and VMGMX (Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. NRMGX is actively managed, while VMGMX is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NRMGX returned 13.77%/yr vs 12.49%/yr for VMGMX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. NRMGX charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VMGMX.
Performance
NRMGX vs. VMGMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NRMGX achieves a 8.52% return, which is significantly higher than VMGMX's 7.81% return. Over the past 10 years, NRMGX has outperformed VMGMX with an annualized return of 13.77%, while VMGMX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.49% annualized return.
NRMGX
- 1D
- -2.51%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 8.52%
- 6M
- 5.29%
- 1Y
- 5.53%
- 3Y*
- 19.70%
- 5Y*
- 6.52%
- 10Y*
- 13.77%
VMGMX
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- YTD
- 7.81%
- 6M
- 5.71%
- 1Y
- 8.25%
- 3Y*
- 15.66%
- 5Y*
- 5.72%
- 10Y*
- 12.49%
NRMGX vs. VMGMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRMGX Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 | 8.52% | 5.72% | 37.37% | 18.53% | -28.68% | 12.71% | 39.81% | 34.07% | -6.01% | 25.18% |
VMGMX Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares | 7.81% | 10.69% | 15.65% | 23.93% | -28.84% | 20.48% | 34.45% | 33.85% | -5.61% | 21.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between NRMGX and VMGMX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014 | 0.96 |
The correlation between NRMGX and VMGMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NRMGX vs. VMGMX — Risk / Return Rank
NRMGX
VMGMX
NRMGX vs. VMGMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (NRMGX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMGMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NRMGX | VMGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.11 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | 0.63 | -0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.20 | 1.88 | -0.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NRMGX vs. VMGMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NRMGX drawdown since its inception was -37.97%, roughly equal to the maximum VMGMX drawdown of -37.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRMGX and VMGMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NRMGX | VMGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.97% | -37.17% | -0.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.65% | -15.95% | -1.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.95% | -21.65% | -4.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.97% | -37.17% | -0.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.97% | -37.17% | -0.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.81% | -2.10% | -0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.25% | -7.00% | -2.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.04% | 5.34% | +0.70% |
Volatility
NRMGX vs. VMGMX - Volatility Comparison
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (NRMGX) has a higher volatility of 7.97% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMGMX) at 7.10%. This indicates that NRMGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMGMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NRMGX | VMGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.97% | 7.10% | +0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.18% | 13.79% | +3.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.51% | 17.04% | +4.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.93% | 21.59% | +2.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.80% | 21.04% | +1.76% |
NRMGX vs. VMGMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NRMGX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than VMGMX's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
NRMGX vs. VMGMX - Dividend Comparison
NRMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.27%, more than VMGMX's 0.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRMGX Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 | 21.27% | 23.08% | 19.50% | 3.17% | 4.85% | 16.27% | 9.48% | 5.39% | 11.66% | 8.94% | 4.85% | 8.78% |
VMGMX Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares | 0.61% | 0.64% | 0.67% | 0.71% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.56% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.72% | 0.81% | 0.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, NRMGX and VMGMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
NRMGX has higher volatility (7.97%) compared to VMGMX (7.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NRMGX dropped -37.97% vs VMGMX's -37.17%.
VMGMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NRMGX and VMGMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer