NRMGX vs. FMDGX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

NRMGX (Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6) and FMDGX (Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. NRMGX is actively managed, while FMDGX is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NRMGX returned 6.52%/yr vs 5.18%/yr for FMDGX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. NRMGX charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for FMDGX.

Performance

NRMGX vs. FMDGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (NRMGX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRMGX achieves a 8.52% return, which is significantly higher than FMDGX's 2.45% return.

NRMGX

• 1D: -2.51%
• 1M: 0.95%
• YTD: 8.52%
• 6M: 5.29%
• 1Y: 5.53%
• 3Y*: 19.70%
• 5Y*: 6.52%
• 10Y*: 13.77%

FMDGX

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: 0.48%
• YTD: 2.45%
• 6M: 0.25%
• 1Y: 1.96%
• 3Y*: 15.18%
• 5Y*: 5.18%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NRMGX vs. FMDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
NRMGX Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6	8.52%	5.72%	37.37%	18.53%	-28.68%	12.71%	39.81%	2.70%
FMDGX Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund	2.45%	8.60%	22.03%	25.79%	-26.67%	12.67%	34.84%	4.63%

Correlation

The correlation between NRMGX and FMDGX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019	0.97

The correlation between NRMGX and FMDGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NRMGX vs. FMDGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRMGX

NRMGX Risk / Return Rank: 6
NRMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
NRMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
NRMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6
NRMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
NRMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

FMDGX

FMDGX Risk / Return Rank: 4
FMDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FMDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
FMDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
FMDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
FMDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NRMGX vs. FMDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (NRMGX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NRMGX	FMDGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.34	0.23	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.61	0.44	+0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.05	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.41	0.26	+0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.20	0.76	+0.44

NRMGX vs. FMDGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NRMGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is higher than the FMDGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRMGX and FMDGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NRMGX vs. FMDGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRMGX drawdown since its inception was -37.97%, roughly equal to the maximum FMDGX drawdown of -38.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRMGX and FMDGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NRMGX	FMDGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.97%	-38.59%	+0.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.65%	-14.75%	-2.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.95%	-25.30%	-0.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.97%	-38.59%	+0.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.81%	-3.37%	+0.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.25%	-11.13%	+1.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.04%	5.10%	+0.94%

Volatility

NRMGX vs. FMDGX - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (NRMGX) has a higher volatility of 7.97% compared to Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX) at 5.88%. This indicates that NRMGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NRMGX	FMDGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.97%	5.88%	+2.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.18%	13.43%	+3.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.51%	17.09%	+4.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.93%	22.46%	+1.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.80%	24.30%	-1.50%

NRMGX vs. FMDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NRMGX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than FMDGX's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

NRMGX vs. FMDGX - Dividend Comparison

NRMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.27%, more than FMDGX's 1.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FMDGX Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund	1.81%	1.85%	0.47%	0.63%	0.81%	6.43%	0.36%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NRMGX Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6	21.27%	23.08%	19.50%	3.17%	4.85%	16.27%	9.48%	5.39%	11.66%	8.94%	4.85%	8.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NRMGX and FMDGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, NRMGX and FMDGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, NRMGX or FMDGX?

NRMGX has higher volatility (7.97%) compared to FMDGX (5.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NRMGX dropped -37.97% vs FMDGX's -38.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NRMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.34 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.