NRGV vs. NEE
NRGV (Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.) and NEE (NextEra Energy, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Utilities sector — NRGV in Utilities - Renewable, NEE in Utilities - Regulated Electric. Over the past 3 years, NRGV returned 34.84%/yr vs 7.96%/yr for NEE. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NRGV vs. NEE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NRGV achieves a 27.11% return, which is significantly higher than NEE's 7.45% return.
NRGV
- 1D
- 9.53%
- 1M
- 33.79%
- YTD
- 27.11%
- 6M
- 75.45%
- 1Y
- 611.34%
- 3Y*
- 34.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NEE
- 1D
- 2.41%
- 1M
- -11.62%
- YTD
- 7.45%
- 6M
- 1.99%
- 1Y
- 24.76%
- 3Y*
- 7.96%
- 5Y*
- 6.03%
- 10Y*
- 13.68%
NRGV vs. NEE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRGV Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. | 27.11% | 102.19% | -2.15% | -25.32% | -66.77% |
NEE NextEra Energy, Inc. | 7.45% | 15.47% | 21.46% | -25.30% | 13.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between NRGV and NEE is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2022 | 0.16 |
Fundamentals
NRGV:
-$0.70
NEE:
$5.27
NRGV:
4.46
NEE:
4.76
NRGV:
$217.02M
NEE:
$27.93B
NRGV:
$47.90M
NEE:
$13.35B
NRGV:
-$75.37M
NEE:
$14.56B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NRGV vs. NEE — Risk / Return Rank
NRGV
NEE
NRGV vs. NEE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV) and NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NRGV | NEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 5.87 | 1.05 | +4.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.88 | 1.56 | +2.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.20 | +0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.97 | 1.71 | +10.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.01 | 5.24 | +19.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NRGV | NEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.87 | 1.05 | +4.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | 0.62 | -0.71 |
Drawdowns
NRGV vs. NEE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NRGV drawdown since its inception was -97.09%, which is greater than NEE's maximum drawdown of -47.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRGV and NEE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NRGV | NEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.09% | -47.81% | -49.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.91% | -14.53% | -36.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -81.48% | -34.57% | -46.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.92% | -12.46% | -60.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.81% | -8.92% | -73.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.36% | 4.75% | +19.61% |
Volatility
NRGV vs. NEE - Volatility Comparison
Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV) has a higher volatility of 36.08% compared to NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) at 8.33%. This indicates that NRGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NRGV | NEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 36.08% | 8.33% | +27.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 73.21% | 17.09% | +56.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 105.09% | 23.77% | +81.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 113.35% | 26.89% | +86.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 113.35% | 25.48% | +87.87% |
Dividends
NRGV vs. NEE - Dividend Comparison
NRGV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEE NextEra Energy, Inc. | 2.05% | 2.82% | 2.87% | 3.08% | 2.03% | 1.65% | 1.81% | 2.06% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 2.91% | 2.96% |
NRGV Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
NRGV vs. NEE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. and NextEra Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
NRGV and NEE have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NRGV has higher volatility (36.08%) compared to NEE (8.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NRGV dropped -97.09% vs NEE's -47.81%.
NRGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.87 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NRGV and NEE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer