NRGD vs. QTAP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NRGD (MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both Leveraged Equities funds. NRGD is passively managed, while QTAP is actively managed. Over the past year, NRGD returned -72.26% vs 22.41% for QTAP. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. NRGD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTAP.

Performance

NRGD vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (NRGD) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRGD achieves a -63.27% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 12.83% return.

NRGD

• 1D: -2.47%
• 1M: 16.95%
• YTD: -63.27%
• 6M: -63.90%
• 1Y: -72.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTAP

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: -0.91%
• YTD: 12.83%
• 6M: 13.01%
• 1Y: 22.41%
• 3Y*: 19.78%
• 5Y*: 12.65%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NRGD vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NRGD MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	-63.27%	-35.40%
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	12.83%	15.87%

Correlation

The correlation between NRGD and QTAP is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	-0.02

The correlation between NRGD and QTAP shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NRGD vs. QTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NRGD	QTAP
Energy	100.0%	0.7%
Basic Materials	-	1.3%
Communication Services	-	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	8.7%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	5.1%
Industrials	-	3.3%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Technology	-	50.7%
Utilities	-	1.6%

Return for Risk

NRGD vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRGD

NRGD Risk / Return Rank: 1
NRGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
NRGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
NRGD Omega Ratio Rank: 1
NRGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NRGD Martin Ratio Rank: 1

QTAP

QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 97
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NRGD vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (NRGD) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NRGD	QTAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.97	3.70	-4.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.82	6.02	-7.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.81	1.94	-1.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.90	9.04	-9.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.45	52.85	-54.29

NRGD vs. QTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NRGD Sharpe Ratio is -0.97, which is lower than the QTAP Sharpe Ratio of 3.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRGD and QTAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NRGD vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRGD drawdown since its inception was -89.64%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRGD and QTAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	NRGD	QTAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.64%	-29.44%	-60.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-80.03%	-2.49%	-77.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.03%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-86.51%	-1.70%	-84.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-59.82%	-4.99%	-54.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	49.93%	0.43%	+49.50%

Volatility

NRGD vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (NRGD) has a higher volatility of 24.74% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 3.03%. This indicates that NRGD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NRGD	QTAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.74%	3.03%	+21.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	59.20%	4.94%	+54.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	75.34%	6.12%	+69.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	88.73%	18.92%	+69.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	88.73%	18.72%	+70.01%

NRGD vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

NRGD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

NRGD vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison

Neither NRGD nor QTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NRGD and QTAP in my portfolio?

NRGD and QTAP have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NRGD or QTAP?

NRGD has higher volatility (24.74%) compared to QTAP (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NRGD dropped -89.64% vs QTAP's -29.44%.

Which ETF is better, NRGD or QTAP?

On 1-year performance, QTAP leads with 22.41% vs -72.26% for NRGD. On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTAP has been the lower-risk option at 3.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NRGD or QTAP?

Over the 1-year period, QTAP has performed better with a 22.41% return vs -72.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NRGD or QTAP?

QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for NRGD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NRGD or QTAP?

NRGD and QTAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between NRGD and QTAP?

They also come from different issuers: BMO and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for NRGD and 0.79% for QTAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.