PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NRFYX vs. PRRSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NRFYX vs. PRRSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Natixis Funds Trust IV AEW Global Focused Real Estate Fund (NRFYX) and PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRFYX achieves a 7.15% return, which is significantly lower than PRRSX's 12.55% return. Over the past 10 years, NRFYX has underperformed PRRSX with an annualized return of 4.02%, while PRRSX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.61% annualized return.


NRFYX

1D
-0.33%
1M
-2.28%
YTD
7.15%
6M
7.17%
1Y
10.27%
3Y*
9.13%
5Y*
1.49%
10Y*
4.02%

PRRSX

1D
0.23%
1M
-0.85%
YTD
12.55%
6M
10.90%
1Y
16.33%
3Y*
11.11%
5Y*
3.77%
10Y*
6.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NRFYX vs. PRRSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NRFYX
Natixis Funds Trust IV AEW Global Focused Real Estate Fund
7.15%7.51%1.47%13.42%-25.75%28.33%-5.50%24.32%-4.52%3.78%
PRRSX
PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund
12.55%5.21%5.11%12.30%-29.37%53.74%-3.80%29.61%-6.42%4.32%

Correlation

The correlation between NRFYX and PRRSX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2003

0.92

The correlation between NRFYX and PRRSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NRFYX vs. PRRSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRFYX
NRFYX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
NRFYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRFYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRFYX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
NRFYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRFYX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

PRRSX
PRRSX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
PRRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
PRRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NRFYX vs. PRRSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natixis Funds Trust IV AEW Global Focused Real Estate Fund (NRFYX) and PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NRFYXPRRSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.21

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

1.85

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.62

6.34

-1.73

NRFYX vs. PRRSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NRFYX Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is comparable to the PRRSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRFYX and PRRSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NRFYXPRRSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

1.17

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.19

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.30

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.35

-0.02

Drawdowns

NRFYX vs. PRRSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRFYX drawdown since its inception was -73.64%, smaller than the maximum PRRSX drawdown of -77.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRFYX and PRRSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NRFYXPRRSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.64%

-77.82%

+4.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.10%

-9.05%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.91%

-17.77%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.95%

-37.14%

+3.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.31%

-45.75%

+5.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.78%

-2.88%

-0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.47%

-13.09%

+0.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

2.62%

+0.26%

Volatility

NRFYX vs. PRRSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Natixis Funds Trust IV AEW Global Focused Real Estate Fund (NRFYX) is 3.59%, while PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX) has a volatility of 4.28%. This indicates that NRFYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRRSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NRFYXPRRSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.59%

4.28%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.63%

10.17%

-0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.99%

14.26%

-1.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.35%

20.20%

-2.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.38%

21.86%

-3.48%

NRFYX vs. PRRSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NRFYX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than PRRSX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

NRFYX vs. PRRSX - Dividend Comparison

NRFYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, more than PRRSX's 0.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NRFYX
Natixis Funds Trust IV AEW Global Focused Real Estate Fund
3.03%2.24%4.51%2.66%3.05%5.98%3.81%17.61%10.05%10.64%11.02%9.66%
PRRSX
PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund
0.79%2.19%0.61%0.00%18.62%34.01%7.21%7.99%0.81%1.67%0.66%8.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


NRFYX and PRRSX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRRSX has higher volatility (4.28%) compared to NRFYX (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NRFYX dropped -73.64% vs PRRSX's -77.82%.

PRRSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NRFYX and PRRSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer