PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NRFYX vs. FRESX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NRFYX vs. FRESX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Natixis Funds Trust IV AEW Global Focused Real Estate Fund (NRFYX) and Fidelity Real Estate Investment Portfolio (FRESX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRFYX achieves a 7.24% return, which is significantly lower than FRESX's 9.92% return. Over the past 10 years, NRFYX has underperformed FRESX with an annualized return of 4.03%, while FRESX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.19% annualized return.


NRFYX

1D
-1.72%
1M
-2.52%
YTD
7.24%
6M
7.08%
1Y
9.68%
3Y*
9.16%
5Y*
1.40%
10Y*
4.03%

FRESX

1D
0.48%
1M
-1.17%
YTD
9.92%
6M
8.98%
1Y
10.25%
3Y*
9.16%
5Y*
3.21%
10Y*
5.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NRFYX vs. FRESX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NRFYX
Natixis Funds Trust IV AEW Global Focused Real Estate Fund
7.24%7.51%1.47%13.42%-25.75%28.33%-5.50%24.32%-4.52%3.78%
FRESX
Fidelity Real Estate Investment Portfolio
9.92%2.54%5.87%10.82%-24.36%42.34%-7.93%25.22%-4.48%4.28%

Correlation

The correlation between NRFYX and FRESX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2000

0.96

Over the past year, the correlation between NRFYX and FRESX has dropped to 0.72 - well below their long-term average of 0.96, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NRFYX vs. FRESX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRFYX
NRFYX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
NRFYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRFYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRFYX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
NRFYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRFYX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

FRESX
FRESX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
FRESX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRESX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRESX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
FRESX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRESX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NRFYX vs. FRESX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natixis Funds Trust IV AEW Global Focused Real Estate Fund (NRFYX) and Fidelity Real Estate Investment Portfolio (FRESX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NRFYXFRESXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.98

0.74

+0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.44

1.10

+0.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.13

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

1.27

+0.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.23

3.66

+1.57

NRFYX vs. FRESX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NRFYX Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is higher than the FRESX Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRFYX and FRESX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NRFYXFRESXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

0.74

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.17

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.25

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.39

-0.06

Drawdowns

NRFYX vs. FRESX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRFYX drawdown since its inception was -73.64%, roughly equal to the maximum FRESX drawdown of -76.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRFYX and FRESX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NRFYXFRESXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.64%

-76.34%

+2.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.10%

-7.78%

-2.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.91%

-16.44%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.95%

-32.13%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.31%

-40.93%

+0.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.69%

-2.87%

-0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.47%

-11.12%

-1.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

2.69%

+0.17%

Volatility

NRFYX vs. FRESX - Volatility Comparison

Natixis Funds Trust IV AEW Global Focused Real Estate Fund (NRFYX) and Fidelity Real Estate Investment Portfolio (FRESX) have volatilities of 3.65% and 3.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NRFYXFRESXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.65%

3.78%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.87%

9.27%

+0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.03%

13.27%

-0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.36%

18.72%

-1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.38%

20.56%

-2.18%

NRFYX vs. FRESX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NRFYX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FRESX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

NRFYX vs. FRESX - Dividend Comparison

NRFYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, less than FRESX's 4.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRESX
Fidelity Real Estate Investment Portfolio
4.22%4.64%5.58%6.95%10.16%3.70%4.77%6.91%4.23%4.00%4.90%6.09%
NRFYX
Natixis Funds Trust IV AEW Global Focused Real Estate Fund
3.03%2.24%4.51%2.66%3.05%5.98%3.81%17.61%10.05%10.64%11.02%9.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


NRFYX and FRESX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRESX has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to NRFYX (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NRFYX dropped -73.64% vs FRESX's -76.34%.

NRFYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NRFYX and FRESX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer