NQCFX vs. RYGRX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NQCFX (Northquest Capital Fund) and RYGRX (Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, NQCFX returned 11.38%/yr vs 13.20%/yr for RYGRX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NQCFX charges 1.47%/yr vs 2.26%/yr for RYGRX.

Performance

NQCFX vs. RYGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northquest Capital Fund (NQCFX) and Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NQCFX achieves a 18.66% return, which is significantly lower than RYGRX's 30.14% return. Over the past 10 years, NQCFX has underperformed RYGRX with an annualized return of 11.38%, while RYGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.20% annualized return.

NQCFX

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: 7.41%
• YTD: 18.66%
• 6M: 17.80%
• 1Y: 28.30%
• 3Y*: 17.11%
• 5Y*: 9.91%
• 10Y*: 11.38%

RYGRX

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: 11.15%
• YTD: 30.14%
• 6M: 30.55%
• 1Y: 37.82%
• 3Y*: 25.67%
• 5Y*: 11.07%
• 10Y*: 13.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NQCFX vs. RYGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NQCFX Northquest Capital Fund	18.66%	10.85%	7.08%	27.28%	-26.10%	32.62%	19.65%	35.76%	-2.05%	14.23%
RYGRX Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund	30.14%	11.00%	25.73%	5.80%	-28.71%	26.61%	26.34%	34.13%	-6.28%	23.74%

Correlation

The correlation between NQCFX and RYGRX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2005	0.89

The correlation between NQCFX and RYGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NQCFX vs. RYGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NQCFX

NQCFX Risk / Return Rank: 42
NQCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
NQCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
NQCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
NQCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
NQCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

RYGRX

RYGRX Risk / Return Rank: 55
RYGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
RYGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
RYGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
RYGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
RYGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NQCFX vs. RYGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northquest Capital Fund (NQCFX) and Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NQCFX	RYGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	2.00	-0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	2.70	-0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.35	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.66	3.53	-0.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.78	13.56	-3.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NQCFX vs. RYGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NQCFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the RYGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NQCFX and RYGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NQCFX	RYGRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.82	2.00	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01	0.47	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.01	0.58	-0.57
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.01	0.44	-0.43

Drawdowns

NQCFX vs. RYGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NQCFX drawdown since its inception was -97.46%, which is greater than RYGRX's maximum drawdown of -54.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NQCFX and RYGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NQCFX	RYGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.46%	-54.22%	-43.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.09%	-11.17%	+0.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-97.46%	-24.95%	-72.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-97.46%	-36.57%	-60.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-97.46%	-36.63%	-60.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-96.17%	0.00%	-96.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.36%	-9.41%	-4.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.01%	2.91%	+0.10%

Volatility

NQCFX vs. RYGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Northquest Capital Fund (NQCFX) is 4.42%, while Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that NQCFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NQCFX	RYGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.42%	6.39%	-1.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.43%	16.30%	-2.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.17%	19.71%	-3.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1,578.46%	23.50%	+1,554.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1,116.43%	22.88%	+1,093.55%

NQCFX vs. RYGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NQCFX has a 1.47% expense ratio, which is lower than RYGRX's 2.26% expense ratio.

Dividends

NQCFX vs. RYGRX - Dividend Comparison

NQCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than RYGRX's 3.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NQCFX Northquest Capital Fund	1.29%	1.53%	0.00%	0.97%	1.13%	6.41%	11.55%	3.07%	6.04%	0.00%	0.00%	3.42%
RYGRX Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund	3.91%	5.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.81%	4.43%	12.10%	7.15%	6.26%	0.05%	2.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NQCFX and RYGRX in my portfolio?

NQCFX and RYGRX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NQCFX or RYGRX?

RYGRX has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to NQCFX (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NQCFX dropped -97.46% vs RYGRX's -54.22%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RYGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.