NQCFX vs. FCGSX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NQCFX (Northquest Capital Fund) and FCGSX (Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, NQCFX returned 11.94%/yr vs 25.14%/yr for FCGSX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NQCFX charges 1.47%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FCGSX.

Performance

NQCFX vs. FCGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northquest Capital Fund (NQCFX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NQCFX having a 22.33% return and FCGSX slightly higher at 22.34%. Over the past 10 years, NQCFX has underperformed FCGSX with an annualized return of 11.94%, while FCGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 25.14% annualized return.

NQCFX

• 1D: 1.07%
• 1M: 6.55%
• YTD: 22.33%
• 6M: 20.91%
• 1Y: 32.87%
• 3Y*: 17.45%
• 5Y*: 9.61%
• 10Y*: 11.94%

FCGSX

• 1D: -1.13%
• 1M: 1.46%
• YTD: 22.34%
• 6M: 20.75%
• 1Y: 53.24%
• 3Y*: 33.28%
• 5Y*: 18.04%
• 10Y*: 25.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NQCFX vs. FCGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NQCFX Northquest Capital Fund	22.33%	10.85%	7.08%	27.28%	-26.10%	32.62%	19.65%	35.76%	-2.05%	14.23%
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund	22.34%	25.52%	38.00%	45.97%	-32.15%	25.13%	70.01%	39.75%	-4.03%	37.69%

Correlation

The correlation between NQCFX and FCGSX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2013	0.83

The correlation between NQCFX and FCGSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NQCFX vs. FCGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NQCFX

NQCFX Risk / Return Rank: 58
NQCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
NQCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
NQCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 48
NQCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
NQCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

FCGSX

FCGSX Risk / Return Rank: 89
FCGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
FCGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FCGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
FCGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
FCGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NQCFX vs. FCGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northquest Capital Fund (NQCFX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NQCFX	FCGSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	2.90	-0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.79	3.61	-0.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.48	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.16	5.25	-2.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.47	22.90	-11.44

NQCFX vs. FCGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NQCFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is lower than the FCGSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NQCFX and FCGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NQCFX vs. FCGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NQCFX drawdown since its inception was -97.46%, which is greater than FCGSX's maximum drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NQCFX and FCGSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NQCFX	FCGSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.46%	-38.77%	-58.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.09%	-10.42%	-0.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-97.46%	-26.07%	-71.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-97.46%	-38.77%	-58.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-97.46%	-38.77%	-58.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-96.05%	-1.74%	-94.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.53%	-6.94%	-7.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.05%	2.38%	+0.67%

Volatility

NQCFX vs. FCGSX - Volatility Comparison

Northquest Capital Fund (NQCFX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) have volatilities of 7.59% and 7.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NQCFX	FCGSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.59%	7.52%	+0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.87%	14.75%	+0.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.50%	18.90%	-1.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1,579.09%	23.84%	+1,555.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1,116.65%	23.34%	+1,093.31%

NQCFX vs. FCGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NQCFX has a 1.47% expense ratio, which is higher than FCGSX's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

NQCFX vs. FCGSX - Dividend Comparison

NQCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than FCGSX's 8.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund	8.56%	10.48%	12.49%	3.13%	0.61%	38.65%	31.99%	11.06%	13.21%	10.51%	2.44%	0.25%
NQCFX Northquest Capital Fund	1.25%	1.53%	0.00%	0.97%	1.13%	6.41%	11.55%	3.07%	6.04%	0.00%	0.00%	3.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NQCFX and FCGSX in my portfolio?

NQCFX and FCGSX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NQCFX or FCGSX?

NQCFX has higher volatility (7.59%) compared to FCGSX (7.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NQCFX dropped -97.46% vs FCGSX's -38.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.