NPFI vs. NUMG
NPFI (Nuveen Preferred And Income ETF) and NUMG (Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NPFI is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by Nuveen, while NUMG is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI TIAA ESG USA Mid Cap Growth. NPFI is actively managed, while NUMG is passively managed. Over the past year, NPFI returned 7.77% vs -0.99% for NUMG. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NPFI charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for NUMG.
Performance
NPFI vs. NUMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NPFI achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly higher than NUMG's -0.70% return.
NPFI
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 2.17%
- 1Y
- 7.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NUMG
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 4.36%
- YTD
- -0.70%
- 6M
- -0.64%
- 1Y
- -0.99%
- 3Y*
- 8.38%
- 5Y*
- 0.93%
- 10Y*
- —
NPFI vs. NUMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NPFI Nuveen Preferred And Income ETF | 1.68% | 9.21% | 6.56% |
NUMG Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF | -0.70% | 0.78% | 8.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between NPFI and NUMG is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024 | 0.50 |
The correlation between NPFI and NUMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NPFI vs. NUMG — Risk / Return Rank
NPFI
NUMG
NPFI vs. NUMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Preferred And Income ETF (NPFI) and Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NPFI | NUMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.01 | +0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | -0.05 | +2.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.83 | -0.13 | +11.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NPFI | NUMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.68 | -0.05 | +2.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.66 | 0.44 | +2.22 |
Drawdowns
NPFI vs. NUMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NPFI drawdown since its inception was -3.18%, smaller than the maximum NUMG drawdown of -38.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NPFI and NUMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NPFI | NUMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.18% | -38.85% | +35.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.18% | -19.71% | +16.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | -9.61% | +9.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.34% | -11.37% | +11.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | 7.59% | -6.93% |
Volatility
NPFI vs. NUMG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen Preferred And Income ETF (NPFI) is 0.75%, while Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that NPFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NPFI | NUMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.75% | 4.71% | -3.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.53% | 14.57% | -12.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.91% | 18.16% | -15.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.95% | 22.85% | -19.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.95% | 21.87% | -18.92% |
NPFI vs. NUMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NPFI has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than NUMG's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
NPFI vs. NUMG - Dividend Comparison
NPFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.40%, more than NUMG's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NPFI Nuveen Preferred And Income ETF | 6.40% | 6.33% | 5.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NUMG Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.06% | 0.18% | 0.18% | 12.76% | 3.82% | 0.27% | 5.14% | 0.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NPFI and NUMG have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NUMG has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to NPFI (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NPFI dropped -3.18% vs NUMG's -38.85%.
On 1-year performance, NPFI leads with 7.77% vs -0.99% for NUMG. On fees, NUMG is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, NPFI has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NPFI has performed better with a 7.77% return vs -0.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NUMG is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for NPFI.
NPFI has the higher dividend yield at 6.40%, compared with 0.01% for NUMG.
NPFI is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while NUMG is Mid Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for NPFI and 0.30% for NUMG.
NPFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NPFI and NUMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer