PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NPFI vs. NUMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NPFI vs. NUMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Preferred And Income ETF (NPFI) and Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NPFI achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly higher than NUMG's -0.70% return.


NPFI

1D
0.06%
1M
0.43%
YTD
1.68%
6M
2.17%
1Y
7.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NUMG

1D
-0.29%
1M
4.36%
YTD
-0.70%
6M
-0.64%
1Y
-0.99%
3Y*
8.38%
5Y*
0.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NPFI vs. NUMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NPFI
Nuveen Preferred And Income ETF
1.68%9.21%6.56%
NUMG
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF
-0.70%0.78%8.26%

Correlation

The correlation between NPFI and NUMG is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024

0.50

The correlation between NPFI and NUMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NPFI vs. NUMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NPFI
NPFI Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
NPFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NPFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
NPFI Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
NPFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
NPFI Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

NUMG
NUMG Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
NUMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUMG Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
NUMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUMG Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NPFI vs. NUMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Preferred And Income ETF (NPFI) and Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NPFINUMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.01

+0.62

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

-0.05

+2.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.83

-0.13

+11.96

NPFI vs. NUMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NPFI Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is higher than the NUMG Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NPFI and NUMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NPFINUMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68

-0.05

+2.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.66

0.44

+2.22

Drawdowns

NPFI vs. NUMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NPFI drawdown since its inception was -3.18%, smaller than the maximum NUMG drawdown of -38.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NPFI and NUMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NPFINUMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.18%

-38.85%

+35.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.18%

-19.71%

+16.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-9.61%

+9.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.34%

-11.37%

+11.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

7.59%

-6.93%

Volatility

NPFI vs. NUMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Preferred And Income ETF (NPFI) is 0.75%, while Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that NPFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NPFINUMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.75%

4.71%

-3.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.53%

14.57%

-12.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91%

18.16%

-15.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.95%

22.85%

-19.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.95%

21.87%

-18.92%

NPFI vs. NUMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NPFI has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than NUMG's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

NPFI vs. NUMG - Dividend Comparison

NPFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.40%, more than NUMG's 0.01% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NPFI
Nuveen Preferred And Income ETF
6.40%6.33%5.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NUMG
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.01%0.01%0.06%0.18%0.18%12.76%3.82%0.27%5.14%0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


NPFI and NUMG have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NUMG has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to NPFI (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NPFI dropped -3.18% vs NUMG's -38.85%.

On 1-year performance, NPFI leads with 7.77% vs -0.99% for NUMG. On fees, NUMG is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, NPFI has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NPFI has performed better with a 7.77% return vs -0.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NUMG is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for NPFI.

NPFI has the higher dividend yield at 6.40%, compared with 0.01% for NUMG.

NPFI is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while NUMG is Mid Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for NPFI and 0.30% for NUMG.

NPFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NPFI and NUMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer