NPFE vs. ITOT
NPFE (NPF Core Equity ETF) and ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. NPFE is actively managed, while ITOT is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NPFE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ITOT.
Performance
NPFE vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NPFE
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITOT
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 2.59%
- 6M
- 9.56%
- YTD
- 11.88%
- 1Y
- 22.72%
- 3Y*
- 20.65%
- 5Y*
- 12.10%
- 10Y*
- 14.77%
NPFE vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NPFE NPF Core Equity ETF | 10.08% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 12.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between NPFE and ITOT is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2026 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NPFE vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank
NPFE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ITOT
NPFE vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NPF Core Equity ETF (NPFE) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NPFE | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.50 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.92 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NPFE vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NPFE drawdown since its inception was -5.44%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NPFE and ITOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NPFE | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -55.20% | +49.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.25% | -0.17% | -1.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.02% | -6.95% | +5.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.04% | — |
Volatility
NPFE vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NPFE | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.32% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.89% | 12.83% | +2.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.89% | 17.46% | -2.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.89% | 18.24% | -3.35% |
NPFE vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
NPFE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
NPFE vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison
NPFE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ITOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 0.99% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.01% |
NPFE NPF Core Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NPFE and ITOT have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for NPFE.
ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.00% for NPFE.
They also come from different issuers: NPF Investment Advisors and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for NPFE and 0.03% for ITOT.
Find the right allocation for NPFE and ITOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer