NOWL vs. XDSQ
NOWL (GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF) and XDSQ (Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NOWL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XDSQ.
Performance
NOWL vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NOWL achieves a -55.17% return, which is significantly lower than XDSQ's 2.80% return.
NOWL
- 1D
- -15.19%
- 1M
- 53.22%
- YTD
- -55.17%
- 6M
- -63.42%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDSQ
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 2.80%
- 6M
- 3.86%
- 1Y
- 15.98%
- 3Y*
- 15.02%
- 5Y*
- 9.80%
- 10Y*
- —
NOWL vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NOWL GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF | -55.17% | -42.58% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | 2.80% | 10.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between NOWL and XDSQ is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NOWL vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank
NOWL
XDSQ
NOWL vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF (NOWL) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NOWL | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.76 | 0.69 | -1.45 |
Drawdowns
NOWL vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOWL drawdown since its inception was -86.57%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOWL and XDSQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOWL | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.57% | -26.06% | -60.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.11% | 0.00% | -76.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.53% | -4.96% | -42.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.01% | — |
Volatility
NOWL vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NOWL | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.57% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.40% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 103.33% | 10.56% | +92.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 103.33% | 15.27% | +88.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 103.33% | 15.10% | +88.23% |
NOWL vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
NOWL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
NOWL vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither NOWL nor XDSQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NOWL and XDSQ have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDSQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDSQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NOWL.
NOWL and XDSQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for NOWL and 0.79% for XDSQ.
Find the right allocation for NOWL and XDSQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer