NOWL vs. QTJL
NOWL (GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NOWL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.
Performance
NOWL vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NOWL achieves a -47.14% return, which is significantly lower than QTJL's 7.15% return.
NOWL
- 1D
- -12.28%
- 1M
- 84.18%
- YTD
- -47.14%
- 6M
- -55.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTJL
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- YTD
- 7.15%
- 6M
- 7.91%
- 1Y
- 20.52%
- 3Y*
- 19.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NOWL vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NOWL GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF | -47.14% | -42.58% |
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 7.15% | 9.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between NOWL and QTJL is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NOWL vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank
NOWL
QTJL
NOWL vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF (NOWL) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NOWL | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.73 | 0.52 | -1.25 |
Drawdowns
NOWL vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOWL drawdown since its inception was -86.57%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOWL and QTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOWL | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.57% | -33.40% | -53.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.83% | -0.01% | -71.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.40% | -7.94% | -39.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.27% | — |
Volatility
NOWL vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NOWL | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.61% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.34% | 10.01% | +92.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 102.34% | 20.42% | +81.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 102.34% | 20.42% | +81.92% |
NOWL vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
NOWL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
NOWL vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither NOWL nor QTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NOWL and QTJL have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NOWL.
NOWL and QTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for NOWL and 0.79% for QTJL.
Find the right allocation for NOWL and QTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer