NOWL vs. COTG
NOWL (GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF) and COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NOWL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for COTG.
Performance
NOWL vs. COTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NOWL achieves a -71.09% return, which is significantly lower than COTG's 15.84% return.
NOWL
- 1D
- 6.15%
- 1M
- -17.53%
- YTD
- -71.09%
- 6M
- -71.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COTG
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- -14.19%
- YTD
- 15.84%
- 6M
- 17.42%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NOWL vs. COTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NOWL GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF | -71.09% | -39.43% |
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 15.84% | -22.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between NOWL and COTG is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NOWL vs. COTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF (NOWL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NOWL vs. COTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOWL drawdown since its inception was -86.57%, which is greater than COTG's maximum drawdown of -25.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOWL and COTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOWL | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.57% | -25.69% | -60.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.59% | -24.45% | -60.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.22% | -9.72% | -39.50% |
Volatility
NOWL vs. COTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NOWL | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 103.16% | 40.02% | +63.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 103.16% | 40.02% | +63.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 103.16% | 40.02% | +63.14% |
NOWL vs. COTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NOWL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than COTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
NOWL vs. COTG - Dividend Comparison
Neither NOWL nor COTG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NOWL and COTG have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NOWL.
NOWL and COTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for NOWL and 0.75% for COTG.
Find the right allocation for NOWL and COTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer