NOWL vs. ARMG
NOWL (GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF) and ARMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NOWL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARMG.
Performance
NOWL vs. ARMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NOWL achieves a -55.17% return, which is significantly lower than ARMG's 936.32% return.
NOWL
- 1D
- -15.19%
- 1M
- 53.22%
- YTD
- -55.17%
- 6M
- -63.42%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMG
- 1D
- 4.85%
- 1M
- 261.28%
- YTD
- 936.32%
- 6M
- 526.62%
- 1Y
- 510.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NOWL vs. ARMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NOWL GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF | -55.17% | -42.58% |
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF | 936.32% | -53.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between NOWL and ARMG is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NOWL vs. ARMG — Risk / Return Rank
NOWL
ARMG
NOWL vs. ARMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF (NOWL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NOWL | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.96 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.76 | 1.24 | -2.00 |
Drawdowns
NOWL vs. ARMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOWL drawdown since its inception was -86.57%, which is greater than ARMG's maximum drawdown of -80.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOWL and ARMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOWL | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.57% | -80.28% | -6.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -68.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.11% | 0.00% | -76.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.53% | -53.04% | +5.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 38.55% | — |
Volatility
NOWL vs. ARMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NOWL | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 64.57% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 103.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 103.33% | 130.31% | -26.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 103.33% | 138.30% | -34.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 103.33% | 138.30% | -34.97% |
NOWL vs. ARMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NOWL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
NOWL vs. ARMG - Dividend Comparison
NOWL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF | 0.47% | 4.86% |
NOWL GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NOWL and ARMG have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NOWL.
ARMG has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.00% for NOWL.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for NOWL and 0.75% for ARMG.
Find the right allocation for NOWL and ARMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer