NOVZ vs. TLTW
NOVZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF) and TLTW (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF) are both Options Trading funds. NOVZ is actively managed, while TLTW is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NOVZ returned 16.53%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for TLTW. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NOVZ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for TLTW.
Performance
NOVZ vs. TLTW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NOVZ achieves a 8.13% return, which is significantly higher than TLTW's 1.21% return.
NOVZ
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 4.10%
- YTD
- 8.13%
- 6M
- 8.04%
- 1Y
- 20.61%
- 3Y*
- 16.53%
- 5Y*
- 11.35%
- 10Y*
- —
TLTW
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 1.21%
- 6M
- -0.20%
- 1Y
- 10.46%
- 3Y*
- 0.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NOVZ vs. TLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOVZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF | 8.13% | 13.03% | 19.09% | 18.06% | -3.05% |
TLTW iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF | 1.21% | 11.36% | -2.18% | 0.73% | -11.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between NOVZ and TLTW is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2022 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NOVZ vs. TLTW — Risk / Return Rank
NOVZ
TLTW
NOVZ vs. TLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF (NOVZ) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NOVZ | TLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.24 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 1.76 | +1.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.64 | 5.28 | +8.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NOVZ | TLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.21 | 1.37 | +0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.11 | -0.03 | +1.14 |
Drawdowns
NOVZ vs. TLTW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOVZ drawdown since its inception was -16.62%, smaller than the maximum TLTW drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOVZ and TLTW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOVZ | TLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.62% | -18.61% | +1.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.72% | -5.97% | -0.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.63% | -17.19% | +2.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.59% | -3.20% | +2.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.06% | -8.25% | +5.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.51% | 1.99% | -0.48% |
Volatility
NOVZ vs. TLTW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF (NOVZ) is 2.35%, while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) has a volatility of 2.48%. This indicates that NOVZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NOVZ | TLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.35% | 2.48% | -0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.97% | 5.79% | +1.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.39% | 7.70% | +1.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.87% | 11.39% | +1.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.71% | 11.39% | +1.32% |
NOVZ vs. TLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
NOVZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTW's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
NOVZ vs. TLTW - Dividend Comparison
NOVZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, less than TLTW's 11.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOVZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF | 3.32% | 3.58% | 2.94% | 2.27% | 0.25% | 0.52% |
TLTW iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF | 11.76% | 14.82% | 14.47% | 19.59% | 8.71% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NOVZ and TLTW have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TLTW has higher volatility (2.48%) compared to NOVZ (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOVZ dropped -16.62% vs TLTW's -18.61%.
On 3-year performance, NOVZ leads with 16.53% vs 0.74% for TLTW. On fees, TLTW is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOVZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, NOVZ has performed better with a 16.53% return vs 0.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TLTW is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for NOVZ.
TLTW has the higher dividend yield at 11.76%, compared with 3.32% for NOVZ.
They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NOVZ and 0.35% for TLTW.
NOVZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NOVZ and TLTW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer