NOVZ vs. PBFB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NOVZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF) and PBFB (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NOVZ returned 20.61% vs 13.63% for PBFB. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NOVZ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PBFB.

Performance

NOVZ vs. PBFB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF (NOVZ) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February (PBFB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOVZ achieves a 8.13% return, which is significantly higher than PBFB's 4.68% return.

NOVZ

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: 4.10%
• YTD: 8.13%
• 6M: 8.04%
• 1Y: 20.61%
• 3Y*: 16.53%
• 5Y*: 11.35%
• 10Y*: —

PBFB

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 1.70%
• YTD: 4.68%
• 6M: 5.66%
• 1Y: 13.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOVZ vs. PBFB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NOVZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF	8.13%	13.03%	16.40%
PBFB PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February	4.68%	9.86%	10.00%

Correlation

The correlation between NOVZ and PBFB is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2024	0.91

The correlation between NOVZ and PBFB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NOVZ vs. PBFB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOVZ

NOVZ Risk / Return Rank: 68
NOVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
NOVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
NOVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 67
NOVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
NOVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 73

PBFB

PBFB Risk / Return Rank: 86
PBFB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
PBFB Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
PBFB Omega Ratio Rank: 92
PBFB Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
PBFB Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOVZ vs. PBFB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF (NOVZ) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February (PBFB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NOVZ	PBFB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	2.87	-0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.04	4.27	-1.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.61	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.08	3.61	-0.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.64	19.17	-5.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NOVZ vs. PBFB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOVZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the PBFB Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOVZ and PBFB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NOVZ	PBFB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.21	2.87	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.11	1.67	-0.56

Drawdowns

NOVZ vs. PBFB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOVZ drawdown since its inception was -16.62%, which is greater than PBFB's maximum drawdown of -8.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOVZ and PBFB.

Drawdown Indicators

	NOVZ	PBFB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.62%	-8.65%	-7.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.72%	-3.79%	-2.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.63%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.62%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.59%	-0.15%	-0.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.06%	-0.60%	-2.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.51%	0.71%	+0.80%

Volatility

NOVZ vs. PBFB - Volatility Comparison

TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF (NOVZ) has a higher volatility of 2.35% compared to PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February (PBFB) at 0.75%. This indicates that NOVZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBFB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NOVZ	PBFB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.35%	0.75%	+1.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.97%	3.71%	+3.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.39%	4.77%	+4.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.87%	6.39%	+6.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.71%	6.39%	+6.32%

NOVZ vs. PBFB - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOVZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PBFB's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

NOVZ vs. PBFB - Dividend Comparison

NOVZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, while PBFB has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
NOVZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF	3.32%	3.58%	2.94%	2.27%	0.25%	0.52%
PBFB PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NOVZ and PBFB in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, NOVZ and PBFB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, NOVZ or PBFB?

NOVZ has higher volatility (2.35%) compared to PBFB (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOVZ dropped -16.62% vs PBFB's -8.65%.

Which ETF is better, NOVZ or PBFB?

On 1-year performance, NOVZ leads with 20.61% vs 13.63% for PBFB. On fees, PBFB is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PBFB has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NOVZ or PBFB?

Over the 1-year period, NOVZ has performed better with a 20.61% return vs 13.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NOVZ or PBFB?

PBFB is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for NOVZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NOVZ or PBFB?

NOVZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 0.00% for PBFB.

What is the main difference between NOVZ and PBFB?

They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NOVZ and 0.50% for PBFB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PBFB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.