PBFB vs. TLTW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PBFB (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February) and TLTW (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF) are both Options Trading funds. PBFB is actively managed, while TLTW is passively managed. Over the past year, PBFB returned 13.63% vs 10.46% for TLTW. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PBFB charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for TLTW.

Performance

PBFB vs. TLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February (PBFB) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBFB achieves a 4.68% return, which is significantly higher than TLTW's 1.21% return.

PBFB

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 1.70%
• YTD: 4.68%
• 6M: 5.66%
• 1Y: 13.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TLTW

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 0.76%
• YTD: 1.21%
• 6M: -0.20%
• 1Y: 10.46%
• 3Y*: 0.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBFB vs. TLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PBFB PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February	4.68%	9.86%	10.00%
TLTW iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF	1.21%	11.36%	-1.61%

Correlation

The correlation between PBFB and TLTW is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2024	0.20

Return for Risk

PBFB vs. TLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBFB

PBFB Risk / Return Rank: 86
PBFB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
PBFB Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
PBFB Omega Ratio Rank: 92
PBFB Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
PBFB Martin Ratio Rank: 88

TLTW

TLTW Risk / Return Rank: 36
TLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
TLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
TLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 35
TLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
TLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBFB vs. TLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February (PBFB) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PBFB	TLTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.87	1.37	+1.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.27	1.96	+2.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.24	+0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.61	1.76	+1.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.17	5.28	+13.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PBFB vs. TLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBFB Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is higher than the TLTW Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBFB and TLTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PBFB	TLTW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.87	1.37	+1.51
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.67	-0.03	+1.70

Drawdowns

PBFB vs. TLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBFB drawdown since its inception was -8.65%, smaller than the maximum TLTW drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBFB and TLTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	PBFB	TLTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.65%	-18.61%	+9.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.79%	-5.97%	+2.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	-3.20%	+3.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.60%	-8.25%	+7.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.71%	1.99%	-1.28%

Volatility

PBFB vs. TLTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February (PBFB) is 0.75%, while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) has a volatility of 2.48%. This indicates that PBFB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PBFB	TLTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.75%	2.48%	-1.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.71%	5.79%	-2.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.77%	7.70%	-2.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.39%	11.39%	-5.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.39%	11.39%	-5.00%

PBFB vs. TLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBFB has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTW's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

PBFB vs. TLTW - Dividend Comparison

PBFB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.76%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
PBFB PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TLTW iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF	11.76%	14.82%	14.47%	19.59%	8.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PBFB and TLTW in my portfolio?

PBFB and TLTW have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PBFB or TLTW?

TLTW has higher volatility (2.48%) compared to PBFB (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBFB dropped -8.65% vs TLTW's -18.61%.

Which ETF is better, PBFB or TLTW?

On 1-year performance, PBFB leads with 13.63% vs 10.46% for TLTW. On fees, TLTW is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, PBFB has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PBFB or TLTW?

Over the 1-year period, PBFB has performed better with a 13.63% return vs 10.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PBFB or TLTW?

TLTW is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PBFB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PBFB or TLTW?

TLTW has the higher dividend yield at 11.76%, compared with 0.00% for PBFB.

What is the main difference between PBFB and TLTW?

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PBFB and 0.35% for TLTW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PBFB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.