PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBFB vs. TLTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PBFB vs. TLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February (PBFB) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PBFB vs. TLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBFB achieves a -1.32% return, which is significantly lower than TLTW's 1.44% return.


PBFB

1D
1.37%
1M
-1.73%
YTD
-1.32%
6M
1.11%
1Y
10.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TLTW

1D
0.22%
1M
-2.98%
YTD
1.44%
6M
2.22%
1Y
7.46%
3Y*
0.70%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PBFB vs. TLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBFB has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTW's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PBFB vs. TLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBFB
PBFB Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PBFB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBFB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBFB Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
PBFB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBFB Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

TLTW
TLTW Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
TLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBFB vs. TLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February (PBFB) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBFBTLTWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.26

0.84

+0.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.89

1.17

+0.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.15

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

1.42

+0.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.60

3.74

+5.87

PBFB vs. TLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBFB Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is higher than the TLTW Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBFB and TLTW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBFBTLTWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

0.84

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.31

-0.03

+1.33

Correlation

The correlation between PBFB and TLTW is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

PBFB vs. TLTW - Dividend Comparison

PBFB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.66%.


TTM2025202420232022
PBFB
PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
13.66%14.82%14.47%19.59%8.71%

Drawdowns

PBFB vs. TLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBFB drawdown since its inception was -8.65%, smaller than the maximum TLTW drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBFB and TLTW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PBFBTLTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.65%

-18.61%

+9.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.16%

-5.80%

-0.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.47%

-2.98%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.63%

-8.49%

+7.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

2.20%

-1.09%

Volatility

PBFB vs. TLTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February (PBFB) is 2.54%, while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) has a volatility of 3.46%. This indicates that PBFB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PBFBTLTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.54%

3.46%

-0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.80%

5.80%

-2.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.31%

8.91%

-0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.54%

11.55%

-5.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.54%

11.55%

-5.01%