PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOSGX vs. NOEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOSGX vs. NOEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Small Cap Value Fund (NOSGX) and Northern Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (NOEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOSGX achieves a 16.32% return, which is significantly lower than NOEMX's 29.36% return. Over the past 10 years, NOSGX has underperformed NOEMX with an annualized return of 8.52%, while NOEMX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.37% annualized return.


NOSGX

1D
1.12%
1M
2.72%
YTD
16.32%
6M
15.39%
1Y
35.68%
3Y*
14.82%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
8.52%

NOEMX

1D
0.86%
1M
9.57%
YTD
29.36%
6M
32.12%
1Y
58.02%
3Y*
24.77%
5Y*
7.67%
10Y*
10.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOSGX vs. NOEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOSGX
Northern Small Cap Value Fund
16.32%10.63%2.60%15.67%-10.50%26.17%-2.29%22.30%-13.79%6.47%
NOEMX
Northern Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund
29.36%33.67%7.10%9.20%-20.53%-3.36%17.63%18.32%-15.04%37.34%

Correlation

The correlation between NOSGX and NOEMX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2006

0.60

The correlation between NOSGX and NOEMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOSGX vs. NOEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOSGX
NOSGX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
NOSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
NOSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

NOEMX
NOEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
NOEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
NOEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOSGX vs. NOEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Small Cap Value Fund (NOSGX) and Northern Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (NOEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NOSGXNOEMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.67

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.22

4.62

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.59

17.77

-3.18

NOSGX vs. NOEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOSGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is lower than the NOEMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOSGX and NOEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NOSGXNOEMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

3.65

-1.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.47

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.59

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.27

+0.14

Drawdowns

NOSGX vs. NOEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOSGX drawdown since its inception was -56.92%, smaller than the maximum NOEMX drawdown of -66.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOSGX and NOEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOSGXNOEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.92%

-66.67%

+9.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.07%

-13.06%

+3.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.13%

-16.34%

-11.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.34%

-37.16%

+8.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.66%

-39.49%

-6.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

0.00%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.05%

-19.02%

+9.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

3.36%

-0.76%

Volatility

NOSGX vs. NOEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Northern Small Cap Value Fund (NOSGX) is 4.74%, while Northern Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (NOEMX) has a volatility of 6.57%. This indicates that NOSGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NOEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOSGXNOEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.74%

6.57%

-1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.73%

14.24%

-2.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.79%

16.55%

+1.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.84%

16.49%

+7.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.56%

17.58%

+6.98%

NOSGX vs. NOEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOSGX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than NOEMX's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOSGX vs. NOEMX - Dividend Comparison

NOSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.82%, more than NOEMX's 1.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOEMX
Northern Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund
1.95%2.53%2.98%3.86%2.42%2.87%2.36%3.24%2.76%1.74%1.92%2.54%
NOSGX
Northern Small Cap Value Fund
37.82%43.99%57.55%6.99%5.84%16.35%1.96%7.08%11.90%9.76%2.26%4.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOSGX and NOEMX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOEMX has higher volatility (6.57%) compared to NOSGX (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOSGX dropped -56.92% vs NOEMX's -66.67%.

NOEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOSGX and NOEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer