PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOSGX vs. SCHA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOSGX vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Small Cap Value Fund (NOSGX) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOSGX achieves a 18.41% return, which is significantly lower than SCHA's 22.53% return. Over the past 10 years, NOSGX has underperformed SCHA with an annualized return of 9.06%, while SCHA has yielded a comparatively higher 11.72% annualized return.


NOSGX

1D
0.42%
1M
3.39%
YTD
18.41%
6M
16.21%
1Y
35.48%
3Y*
15.74%
5Y*
7.67%
10Y*
9.06%

SCHA

1D
-1.72%
1M
4.56%
YTD
22.53%
6M
20.00%
1Y
41.81%
3Y*
19.85%
5Y*
7.30%
10Y*
11.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOSGX vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOSGX
Northern Small Cap Value Fund
18.41%10.63%2.60%15.67%-10.50%26.17%-2.29%22.30%-13.79%6.47%
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
22.53%11.60%11.16%18.46%-19.81%16.45%19.34%26.50%-11.79%14.94%

Correlation

The correlation between NOSGX and SCHA is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009

0.94

The correlation between NOSGX and SCHA shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (1 year) to 0.94 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOSGX vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOSGX
NOSGX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
NOSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
NOSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHA
SCHA Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SCHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHA Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHA Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOSGX vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Small Cap Value Fund (NOSGX) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOSGXSCHADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.37

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.22

4.42

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.61

16.18

-1.56

NOSGX vs. SCHA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOSGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the SCHA Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOSGX and SCHA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOSGX vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOSGX drawdown since its inception was -56.92%, which is greater than SCHA's maximum drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOSGX and SCHA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOSGXSCHADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.92%

-42.41%

-14.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.07%

-9.50%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.13%

-27.29%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.34%

-30.79%

+2.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.66%

-42.41%

-3.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-1.72%

+1.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.04%

-7.56%

-1.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

2.59%

+0.01%

Volatility

NOSGX vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Northern Small Cap Value Fund (NOSGX) is 4.98%, while Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that NOSGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOSGXSCHADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.98%

6.71%

-1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.07%

13.92%

-1.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.07%

18.77%

-0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.82%

22.05%

+1.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.58%

22.75%

+1.83%

NOSGX vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOSGX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOSGX vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison

NOSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.15%, more than SCHA's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOSGX
Northern Small Cap Value Fund
37.15%43.99%57.55%6.99%5.84%16.35%1.96%7.08%11.90%9.76%2.26%4.50%
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
0.98%1.26%1.51%1.42%1.37%1.19%1.05%1.39%1.58%1.24%1.50%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOSGX and SCHA have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHA has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to NOSGX (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOSGX dropped -56.92% vs SCHA's -42.41%.

SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOSGX and SCHA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer