PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NORW vs. RFEU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NORW vs. RFEU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) and First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF (RFEU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NORW achieves a 26.31% return, which is significantly higher than RFEU's 1.50% return. Over the past 10 years, NORW has outperformed RFEU with an annualized return of 9.61%, while RFEU has yielded a comparatively lower 7.29% annualized return.


NORW

1D
-0.52%
1M
-2.27%
YTD
26.31%
6M
31.64%
1Y
36.12%
3Y*
23.02%
5Y*
7.99%
10Y*
9.61%

RFEU

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
1.50%
6M
4.04%
1Y
13.97%
3Y*
12.44%
5Y*
3.74%
10Y*
7.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NORW vs. RFEU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NORW
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
26.31%32.59%-2.50%5.03%-12.55%13.65%26.00%14.39%-10.39%24.03%
RFEU
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF
1.50%30.78%-1.78%16.19%-24.17%22.83%6.25%23.21%-17.57%26.58%

Correlation

The correlation between NORW and RFEU is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2016

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between NORW and RFEU has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

NORW vs. RFEU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NORW
RFEU

Energy

29.4%
8.7%

Financial Services

22.6%
18.9%

Industrials

13.3%
15.4%

Consumer Defensive

12.5%
9.3%

Basic Materials

10.9%
1.2%

Communication Services

5.9%
3.8%

Technology

4.1%
12.5%

Utilities

0.7%
6.4%

Real Estate

0.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.2%
10.6%

Healthcare

-

13.3%

Energy

NORW
29.4%
RFEU
8.7%

Financial Services

NORW
22.6%
RFEU
18.9%

Industrials

NORW
13.3%
RFEU
15.4%

Consumer Defensive

NORW
12.5%
RFEU
9.3%

Basic Materials

NORW
10.9%
RFEU
1.2%

Communication Services

NORW
5.9%
RFEU
3.8%

Technology

NORW
4.1%
RFEU
12.5%

Utilities

NORW
0.7%
RFEU
6.4%

Real Estate

NORW
0.4%
RFEU

-

Consumer Cyclical

NORW
0.2%
RFEU
10.6%

Healthcare

NORW

-

RFEU
13.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NORW vs. RFEU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NORW
NORW Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
NORW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NORW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
NORW Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
NORW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NORW Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

RFEU
RFEU Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
RFEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFEU Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
RFEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFEU Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NORW vs. RFEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) and First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF (RFEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NORWRFEUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.39

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.95

2.99

+0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.27

10.93

+0.34

NORW vs. RFEU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NORW Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the RFEU Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NORW and RFEU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NORWRFEUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

1.77

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.23

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.41

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.41

-0.01

Drawdowns

NORW vs. RFEU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NORW drawdown since its inception was -35.62%, smaller than the maximum RFEU drawdown of -39.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NORW and RFEU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NORWRFEUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.62%

-39.74%

+4.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.18%

-5.15%

-4.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.06%

-13.48%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.78%

-35.92%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.86%

-39.74%

+5.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.53%

-0.11%

-3.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.13%

-9.62%

-0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.21%

1.35%

+1.86%

Volatility

NORW vs. RFEU - Volatility Comparison

Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) has a higher volatility of 4.06% compared to First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF (RFEU) at 0.00%. This indicates that NORW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFEU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NORWRFEUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.06%

0.00%

+4.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.73%

4.43%

+8.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.70%

8.73%

+7.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.88%

16.77%

+5.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.80%

17.86%

+2.94%

NORW vs. RFEU - Expense Ratio Comparison

NORW has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than RFEU's 0.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

NORW vs. RFEU - Dividend Comparison

NORW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than RFEU's 2.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NORW
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
2.72%3.44%6.02%5.27%4.01%1.51%1.13%2.47%3.53%3.64%3.79%2.95%
RFEU
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF
2.83%2.87%5.45%3.37%4.98%1.82%2.32%3.08%2.84%1.35%3.16%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NORW and RFEU have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NORW has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to RFEU (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NORW dropped -35.62% vs RFEU's -39.74%.

On 10-year performance, NORW leads with 9.61% vs 7.29% for RFEU. On fees, NORW is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, RFEU has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, NORW has performed better with a 9.61% return vs 7.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NORW is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.83% for RFEU.

RFEU has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 2.72% for NORW.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for NORW and 0.83% for RFEU.

NORW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NORW and RFEU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer