NORW vs. FLEU
NORW (Global X MSCI Norway ETF) and FLEU (Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - NORW tracks the MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index while FLEU tracks the FTSE Developed Eurozone Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NORW returned 7.99%/yr vs 11.81%/yr for FLEU. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NORW charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLEU.
Performance
NORW vs. FLEU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NORW achieves a 26.31% return, which is significantly higher than FLEU's 6.27% return.
NORW
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- YTD
- 26.31%
- 6M
- 31.64%
- 1Y
- 36.12%
- 3Y*
- 23.02%
- 5Y*
- 7.99%
- 10Y*
- 9.61%
FLEU
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 4.88%
- YTD
- 6.27%
- 6M
- 9.17%
- 1Y
- 18.35%
- 3Y*
- 16.47%
- 5Y*
- 11.81%
- 10Y*
- —
NORW vs. FLEU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NORW Global X MSCI Norway ETF | 26.31% | 32.59% | -2.50% | 5.03% | -12.55% | 13.65% | 26.00% | 14.39% | -10.39% | -1.39% |
FLEU Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF | 6.27% | 41.56% | 2.26% | 16.21% | -9.14% | 23.27% | 0.95% | 26.94% | -8.54% | -1.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between NORW and FLEU is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017 | 0.57 |
The correlation between NORW and FLEU shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NORW vs. FLEU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NORW
FLEU
Energy
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
Utilities
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Energy
NORW
FLEU
Financial Services
NORW
FLEU
Industrials
NORW
FLEU
Consumer Defensive
NORW
FLEU
Basic Materials
NORW
FLEU
Communication Services
NORW
FLEU
Technology
NORW
FLEU
Utilities
NORW
FLEU
Real Estate
NORW
FLEU
Consumer Cyclical
NORW
FLEU
Healthcare
NORW
-
FLEU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NORW vs. FLEU — Risk / Return Rank
NORW
FLEU
NORW vs. FLEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) and Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF (FLEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NORW | FLEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.18 | 1.08 | +1.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.00 | 1.62 | +1.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.20 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.95 | 1.37 | +2.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.27 | 4.99 | +6.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NORW | FLEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.18 | 1.08 | +1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.73 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.57 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
NORW vs. FLEU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NORW drawdown since its inception was -35.62%, roughly equal to the maximum FLEU drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NORW and FLEU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NORW | FLEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.62% | -33.94% | -1.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.18% | -13.41% | +4.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.06% | -15.67% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.78% | -18.67% | -14.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.53% | -1.50% | -2.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.13% | -4.71% | -5.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 3.68% | -0.47% |
Volatility
NORW vs. FLEU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) is 4.06%, while Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF (FLEU) has a volatility of 6.75%. This indicates that NORW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLEU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NORW | FLEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.06% | 6.75% | -2.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.73% | 14.38% | -1.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.70% | 17.02% | -0.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.88% | 16.34% | +5.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.80% | 18.25% | +2.55% |
NORW vs. FLEU - Expense Ratio Comparison
NORW has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FLEU's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
NORW vs. FLEU - Dividend Comparison
NORW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, more than FLEU's 2.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLEU Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF | 2.09% | 2.22% | 3.18% | 3.25% | 21.45% | 3.03% | 1.94% | 6.06% | 12.17% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NORW Global X MSCI Norway ETF | 2.72% | 3.44% | 6.02% | 5.27% | 4.01% | 1.51% | 1.13% | 2.47% | 3.53% | 3.64% | 3.79% | 2.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NORW and FLEU have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLEU has higher volatility (6.75%) compared to NORW (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NORW dropped -35.62% vs FLEU's -33.94%.
On 5-year performance, FLEU leads with 11.81% vs 7.99% for NORW. On fees, FLEU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, NORW has been the lower-risk option at 4.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLEU has performed better with a 11.81% return vs 7.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLEU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for NORW.
NORW has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 2.09% for FLEU.
NORW tracks MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index, while FLEU tracks FTSE Developed Eurozone Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for NORW and 0.09% for FLEU.
NORW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NORW and FLEU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer