PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NORW vs. FKU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NORW vs. FKU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) and First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX Fund (FKU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NORW achieves a 25.23% return, which is significantly higher than FKU's 11.34% return. Over the past 10 years, NORW has outperformed FKU with an annualized return of 9.90%, while FKU has yielded a comparatively lower 8.71% annualized return.


NORW

1D
0.86%
1M
8.72%
6M
15.41%
YTD
25.23%
1Y
34.00%
3Y*
19.17%
5Y*
7.45%
10Y*
9.90%
ALL TIME*
8.95%

FKU

1D
-0.74%
1M
3.13%
6M
5.27%
YTD
11.34%
1Y
25.35%
3Y*
21.10%
5Y*
9.07%
10Y*
8.71%
ALL TIME*
7.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$95.53K$83.68K$235.13K
$730.42K$1.20M$2.79M

NORW vs. FKU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NORW
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
25.23%32.59%-2.50%5.03%-12.55%13.65%26.00%14.39%-10.39%24.03%
FKU
First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX Fund
11.34%37.97%8.06%20.59%-24.12%20.55%-6.01%32.90%-16.21%25.81%

Correlation

The correlation between NORW and FKU is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2012

0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between NORW and FKU has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

NORW vs. FKU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NORW
FKU

Energy

28.3%
3.3%

Financial Services

23.8%
29.3%

Industrials

14.8%
12.7%

Consumer Defensive

11.7%
7.0%

Basic Materials

9.5%
16.1%

Communication Services

6.5%
6.6%

Technology

3.7%

-

Utilities

0.7%
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

0.6%
13.0%

Real Estate

0.4%
4.2%

Healthcare

-

5.4%

Energy

NORW
28.3%
FKU
3.3%

Financial Services

NORW
23.8%
FKU
29.3%

Industrials

NORW
14.8%
FKU
12.7%

Consumer Defensive

NORW
11.7%
FKU
7.0%

Basic Materials

NORW
9.5%
FKU
16.1%

Communication Services

NORW
6.5%
FKU
6.6%

Technology

NORW
3.7%
FKU

-

Utilities

NORW
0.7%
FKU
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

NORW
0.6%
FKU
13.0%

Real Estate

NORW
0.4%
FKU
4.2%

Healthcare

NORW

-

FKU
5.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NORW vs. FKU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NORW
NORW Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NORW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NORW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
NORW Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
NORW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
NORW Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

FKU
FKU Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
FKU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKU Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FKU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKU Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NORW vs. FKU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) and First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX Fund (FKU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NORWFKUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.26

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

1.80

+0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.35

5.74

+1.61

NORW vs. FKU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NORW Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the FKU Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NORW and FKU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NORW vs. FKU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NORW drawdown since its inception was -35.62%, smaller than the maximum FKU drawdown of -54.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NORW and FKU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NORWFKUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.62%

-54.39%

+18.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.49%

-14.25%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.06%

-14.25%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.78%

-41.54%

+8.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.86%

-54.39%

+20.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.36%

-0.74%

-3.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.12%

-10.73%

+0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.63%

4.47%

+0.16%

Volatility

NORW vs. FKU - Volatility Comparison

Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) has a higher volatility of 5.02% compared to First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX Fund (FKU) at 4.76%. This indicates that NORW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FKU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NORWFKUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.02%

4.76%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.10%

15.54%

-1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.33%

17.80%

-0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.01%

22.86%

-0.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.56%

23.22%

-2.66%

NORW vs. FKU - Expense Ratio Comparison

NORW has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FKU's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

NORW vs. FKU - Dividend Comparison

NORW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.19%, more than FKU's 3.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FKU
First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX Fund
3.67%2.89%4.07%3.82%5.55%2.98%1.48%3.34%5.12%2.93%2.60%2.64%
NORW
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
7.19%3.44%6.02%5.27%4.01%1.51%1.13%2.47%3.53%3.64%3.79%2.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


NORW and FKU have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NORW has higher volatility (5.02%) compared to FKU (4.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NORW dropped -35.62% vs FKU's -54.39%.

On 10-year performance, NORW leads with 9.90% vs 8.71% for FKU. On fees, NORW is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FKU has been the lower-risk option at 4.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, NORW has performed better with a 9.90% return vs 8.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NORW is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FKU.

NORW has the higher dividend yield at 7.19%, compared with 3.67% for FKU.

NORW tracks MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index, while FKU tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX United Kingdom Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for NORW and 0.80% for FKU.

NORW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NORW and FKU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer