NORW vs. EWP
NORW (Global X MSCI Norway ETF) and EWP (iShares MSCI Spain ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - NORW tracks the MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index while EWP tracks the MSCI Spain Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NORW returned 9.67%/yr vs 11.11%/yr for EWP. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
NORW vs. EWP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NORW achieves a 26.97% return, which is significantly higher than EWP's 6.62% return. Over the past 10 years, NORW has underperformed EWP with an annualized return of 9.67%, while EWP has yielded a comparatively higher 11.11% annualized return.
NORW
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- YTD
- 26.97%
- 6M
- 34.10%
- 1Y
- 35.24%
- 3Y*
- 23.23%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- 9.67%
EWP
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- YTD
- 6.62%
- 6M
- 12.03%
- 1Y
- 34.29%
- 3Y*
- 31.36%
- 5Y*
- 17.20%
- 10Y*
- 11.11%
NORW vs. EWP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NORW Global X MSCI Norway ETF | 26.97% | 32.59% | -2.50% | 5.03% | -12.55% | 13.65% | 26.00% | 14.39% | -10.39% | 24.03% |
EWP iShares MSCI Spain ETF | 6.62% | 78.03% | 5.70% | 30.26% | -5.18% | 0.25% | -3.94% | 11.93% | -15.32% | 26.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between NORW and EWP is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2009 | 0.66 |
Over the past year, the correlation between NORW and EWP has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
NORW vs. EWP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NORW
EWP
Energy
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
Technology
Utilities
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Energy
NORW
EWP
Financial Services
NORW
EWP
Industrials
NORW
EWP
Consumer Defensive
NORW
EWP
-
Basic Materials
NORW
EWP
-
Communication Services
NORW
EWP
Technology
NORW
EWP
Utilities
NORW
EWP
Real Estate
NORW
EWP
Consumer Cyclical
NORW
EWP
Healthcare
NORW
-
EWP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NORW vs. EWP — Risk / Return Rank
NORW
EWP
NORW vs. EWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) and iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NORW | EWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.12 | 1.84 | +0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.93 | 2.48 | +0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.32 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.20 | 3.18 | +1.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.03 | 11.33 | +0.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NORW | EWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 1.84 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.85 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.50 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.31 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
NORW vs. EWP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NORW drawdown since its inception was -35.62%, smaller than the maximum EWP drawdown of -61.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NORW and EWP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NORW | EWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.62% | -61.19% | +25.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.18% | -11.38% | +2.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.06% | -12.19% | -3.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.78% | -33.91% | +1.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.86% | -46.36% | +12.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.03% | -1.56% | -1.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.13% | -21.44% | +11.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 3.19% | +0.02% |
Volatility
NORW vs. EWP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) is 4.11%, while iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) has a volatility of 6.86%. This indicates that NORW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NORW | EWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.11% | 6.86% | -2.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.73% | 15.60% | -2.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.86% | 18.76% | -1.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.88% | 20.24% | +1.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.81% | 22.23% | -1.42% |
NORW vs. EWP - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both NORW and EWP have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
NORW vs. EWP - Dividend Comparison
NORW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, more than EWP's 2.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWP iShares MSCI Spain ETF | 2.13% | 2.27% | 4.35% | 2.70% | 3.07% | 3.29% | 2.56% | 3.72% | 3.69% | 2.72% | 4.65% | 3.85% |
NORW Global X MSCI Norway ETF | 2.71% | 3.44% | 6.02% | 5.27% | 4.01% | 1.51% | 1.13% | 2.47% | 3.53% | 3.64% | 3.79% | 2.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NORW and EWP have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWP has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to NORW (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NORW dropped -35.62% vs EWP's -61.19%.
On 10-year performance, EWP leads with 11.11% vs 9.67% for NORW. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, NORW has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWP has performed better with a 11.11% return vs 9.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NORW and EWP have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
NORW has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 2.13% for EWP.
NORW tracks MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index, while EWP tracks MSCI Spain Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares.
NORW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NORW and EWP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer