PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NORW vs. DTCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NORW vs. DTCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NORW achieves a 25.23% return, which is significantly lower than DTCR's 30.53% return.


NORW

1D
0.86%
1M
8.72%
6M
15.41%
YTD
25.23%
1Y
34.00%
3Y*
19.17%
5Y*
7.45%
10Y*
9.90%
ALL TIME*
8.95%

DTCR

1D
-0.90%
1M
-3.58%
6M
12.55%
YTD
30.53%
1Y
47.91%
3Y*
27.27%
5Y*
11.34%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$22.41M$38.68M$44.72M
$730.42K$1.20M$2.79M

NORW vs. DTCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
NORW
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
25.23%32.59%-2.50%5.03%-12.55%13.65%16.23%
DTCR
Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF
30.53%28.99%14.92%18.93%-30.89%20.35%6.60%

Correlation

The correlation between NORW and DTCR is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2020

0.41

The correlation between NORW and DTCR shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NORW vs. DTCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NORW
NORW Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NORW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NORW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
NORW Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
NORW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
NORW Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

DTCR
DTCR Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
DTCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTCR Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
DTCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTCR Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NORW vs. DTCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NORWDTCRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.30

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

2.55

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.35

8.11

-0.77

NORW vs. DTCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NORW Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the DTCR Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NORW and DTCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NORW vs. DTCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NORW drawdown since its inception was -35.62%, smaller than the maximum DTCR drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NORW and DTCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NORWDTCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.62%

-38.98%

+3.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.49%

-17.88%

+3.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.06%

-24.96%

+8.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.78%

-38.98%

+6.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.36%

-15.15%

+10.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.12%

-12.26%

+2.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.63%

5.62%

-0.99%

Volatility

NORW vs. DTCR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) is 5.02%, while Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) has a volatility of 8.80%. This indicates that NORW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DTCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NORWDTCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.02%

8.80%

-3.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.10%

19.77%

-5.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.33%

24.75%

-7.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.01%

22.50%

-0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.56%

22.25%

-1.69%

NORW vs. DTCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NORW and DTCR have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

NORW vs. DTCR - Dividend Comparison

NORW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.19%, more than DTCR's 0.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DTCR
Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF
0.90%1.10%1.72%1.18%2.57%1.27%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NORW
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
7.19%3.44%6.02%5.27%4.01%1.51%1.13%2.47%3.53%3.64%3.79%2.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


NORW and DTCR have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DTCR has higher volatility (8.80%) compared to NORW (5.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NORW dropped -35.62% vs DTCR's -38.98%.

On 5-year performance, DTCR leads with 11.34% vs 7.45% for NORW. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, NORW has been the lower-risk option at 5.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DTCR has performed better with a 11.34% return vs 7.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NORW and DTCR have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

NORW has the higher dividend yield at 7.19%, compared with 0.90% for DTCR.

NORW is categorized as Europe Equities, while DTCR is REIT. NORW tracks MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index, while DTCR tracks Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index.

NORW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NORW and DTCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer