PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOMD vs. TTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NOMD vs. TTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) and TotalEnergies SE (TTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOMD achieves a -13.98% return, which is significantly lower than TTE's 35.99% return. Over the past 10 years, NOMD has underperformed TTE with an annualized return of 2.48%, while TTE has yielded a comparatively higher 17.46% annualized return.


NOMD

1D
0.58%
1M
14.74%
YTD
-13.98%
6M
-12.86%
1Y
-37.18%
3Y*
-13.18%
5Y*
-17.90%
10Y*
2.48%

TTE

1D
0.34%
1M
-3.67%
YTD
35.99%
6M
37.38%
1Y
46.26%
3Y*
22.82%
5Y*
24.45%
10Y*
17.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOMD vs. TTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOMD
Nomad Foods Limited
-13.98%-22.15%2.39%-1.68%-32.10%-0.12%13.63%33.79%-1.12%76.70%
TTE
TotalEnergies SE
35.99%31.96%-11.58%10.48%37.55%56.52%-9.98%15.41%-2.56%12.42%

Correlation

The correlation between NOMD and TTE is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.10

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NOMD:

$1.48B

TTE:

$190.48B

EPS

NOMD:

€0.91

TTE:

$6.84

PE Ratio

NOMD:

9.92

TTE:

12.86

PEG Ratio

NOMD:

16.02

TTE:

10.91

PS Ratio

NOMD:

0.44

TTE:

1.05

PB Ratio

NOMD:

0.51

TTE:

1.55

Total Revenue (TTM)

NOMD:

€3.00B

TTE:

$183.34B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NOMD:

€798.02M

TTE:

$61.59B

EBITDA (TTM)

NOMD:

€343.69M

TTE:

$37.85B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOMD vs. TTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOMD
NOMD Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
NOMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOMD Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
NOMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOMD Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

TTE
TTE Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
TTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTE Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
TTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTE Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOMD vs. TTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) and TotalEnergies SE (TTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOMDTTEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

1.31

-0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.79

4.76

-5.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.18

13.12

-14.29

NOMD vs. TTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOMD Sharpe Ratio is -1.19, which is lower than the TTE Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOMD and TTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOMD vs. TTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOMD drawdown since its inception was -67.99%, which is greater than TTE's maximum drawdown of -62.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOMD and TTE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOMDTTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.99%

-62.81%

-5.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.12%

-9.77%

-37.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.77%

-24.51%

-28.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.17%

-24.95%

-42.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.99%

-62.81%

-5.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.27%

-5.96%

-57.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.33%

-18.95%

-6.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.68%

3.54%

+28.14%

Volatility

NOMD vs. TTE - Volatility Comparison

Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) has a higher volatility of 10.46% compared to TotalEnergies SE (TTE) at 5.41%. This indicates that NOMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOMDTTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.46%

5.41%

+5.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.57%

18.34%

+6.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.36%

25.29%

+6.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.27%

35.97%

-6.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.71%

37.64%

-8.93%

Dividends

NOMD vs. TTE - Dividend Comparison

NOMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.52%, more than TTE's 4.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOMD
Nomad Foods Limited
6.52%5.44%3.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TTE
TotalEnergies SE
4.48%9.64%9.09%4.60%8.41%27.22%10.10%6.52%4.07%4.51%4.77%5.46%

Financials

NOMD vs. TTE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nomad Foods Limited and TotalEnergies SE. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
726.96M
48.90B
(NOMD) Total Revenue
(TTE) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. NOMD values in EUR, TTE values in USD

NOMD vs. TTE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Nomad Foods Limited and TotalEnergies SE over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
25.7%
20.5%
Portfolio components
NOMD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nomad Foods Limited reported a gross profit of 186.62M and revenue of 726.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.7%.

TTE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TotalEnergies SE reported a gross profit of 10.03B and revenue of 48.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.5%.

NOMD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nomad Foods Limited reported an operating income of 67.70M and revenue of 726.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.3%.

TTE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TotalEnergies SE reported an operating income of 10.03B and revenue of 48.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.5%.

NOMD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nomad Foods Limited reported a net income of 29.38M and revenue of 726.96M, resulting in a net margin of 4.0%.

TTE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TotalEnergies SE reported a net income of 5.74B and revenue of 48.90B, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NOMD and TTE have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOMD has higher volatility (10.46%) compared to TTE (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOMD dropped -67.99% vs TTE's -62.81%.

TTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs -1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOMD and TTE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer