NOMD vs. MONC.MI

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

NOMD (Nomad Foods Limited) and MONC.MI (Moncler SpA) are both stocks. NOMD operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while MONC.MI operates in Apparel Manufacturing (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, NOMD returned 2.48%/yr vs 16.22%/yr for MONC.MI. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NOMD vs. MONC.MI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) and Moncler SpA (MONC.MI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

NOMD is traded in USD, while MONC.MI is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the MONC.MI values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOMD achieves a -13.98% return, which is significantly lower than MONC.MI's -0.64% return. Over the past 10 years, NOMD has underperformed MONC.MI with an annualized return of 2.48%, while MONC.MI has yielded a comparatively higher 16.22% annualized return.

NOMD

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 14.74%
• YTD: -13.98%
• 6M: -12.86%
• 1Y: -37.18%
• 3Y*: -13.18%
• 5Y*: -17.90%
• 10Y*: 2.48%

MONC.MI

• 1D: -3.85%
• 1M: 7.73%
• YTD: -0.64%
• 6M: -2.46%
• 1Y: 6.25%
• 3Y*: -2.00%
• 5Y*: 0.03%
• 10Y*: 16.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOMD vs. MONC.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NOMD Nomad Foods Limited	-13.98%	-22.15%	2.39%	-1.68%	-32.10%	-0.12%	13.63%	33.79%	-1.12%	76.70%
MONC.MI Moncler SpA	-0.64%	24.37%	-12.13%	18.14%	-25.89%	18.61%	37.36%	37.12%	6.47%	81.59%

Correlation

The correlation between NOMD and MONC.MI is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.16

Return for Risk

NOMD vs. MONC.MI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOMD

NOMD Risk / Return Rank: 8
NOMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
NOMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
NOMD Omega Ratio Rank: 5
NOMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
NOMD Martin Ratio Rank: 16

MONC.MI

MONC.MI Risk / Return Rank: 48
MONC.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
MONC.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
MONC.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 44
MONC.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
MONC.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOMD vs. MONC.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) and Moncler SpA (MONC.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NOMD	MONC.MI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.19	0.18	-1.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.74	0.54	-2.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.78	1.06	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.79	0.38	-1.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.18	0.77	-1.95

NOMD vs. MONC.MI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOMD Sharpe Ratio is -1.19, which is lower than the MONC.MI Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOMD and MONC.MI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NOMD vs. MONC.MI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOMD drawdown since its inception was -67.99%, which is greater than MONC.MI's maximum drawdown of -49.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOMD and MONC.MI.

Drawdown Indicators

	NOMD	MONC.MI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.99%	-49.96%	-18.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.12%	-16.46%	-30.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-52.77%	-35.65%	-17.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-67.17%	-49.96%	-17.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-67.99%	-49.96%	-18.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-63.27%	-12.80%	-50.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.33%	-18.00%	-7.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.68%	8.08%	+23.60%

Volatility

NOMD vs. MONC.MI - Volatility Comparison

Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) has a higher volatility of 10.46% compared to Moncler SpA (MONC.MI) at 9.63%. This indicates that NOMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MONC.MI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NOMD	MONC.MI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.46%	9.63%	+0.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.57%	25.78%	-1.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.36%	34.13%	-2.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.27%	34.93%	-5.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.71%	33.99%	-5.28%

Dividends

NOMD vs. MONC.MI - Dividend Comparison

NOMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.52%, more than MONC.MI's 2.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MONC.MI Moncler SpA	2.60%	2.37%	2.26%	2.01%	1.21%	0.70%	0.00%	1.00%	0.97%	0.69%	0.85%	0.93%
NOMD Nomad Foods Limited	6.52%	5.44%	3.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NOMD and MONC.MI in my portfolio?

NOMD and MONC.MI have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.