MONC.MI vs. NOVO-B.CO
Compare and contrast key facts about Moncler SpA (MONC.MI) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NOVO-B.CO).
Performance
MONC.MI vs. NOVO-B.CO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MONC.MI vs. NOVO-B.CO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MONC.MI Moncler SpA | -3.93% | 10.17% | -6.80% | 14.52% | -21.57% | 28.76% | 27.39% | 40.08% | 11.72% | 59.09% |
NOVO-B.CO Novo Nordisk A/S | -24.63% | -46.44% | -9.91% | 50.83% | 29.14% | 76.14% | 13.26% | 32.53% | -8.71% | 35.09% |
Different Trading Currencies
MONC.MI is traded in EUR, while NOVO-B.CO is traded in DKK. To make them comparable, the NOVO-B.CO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MONC.MI achieves a -3.93% return, which is significantly higher than NOVO-B.CO's -24.63% return. Over the past 10 years, MONC.MI has outperformed NOVO-B.CO with an annualized return of 15.13%, while NOVO-B.CO has yielded a comparatively lower 5.25% annualized return.
MONC.MI
- 1D
- 2.65%
- 1M
- -6.75%
- YTD
- -3.93%
- 6M
- 5.02%
- 1Y
- -6.07%
- 3Y*
- -4.17%
- 5Y*
- 2.85%
- 10Y*
- 15.13%
NOVO-B.CO
- 1D
- 2.73%
- 1M
- 3.44%
- YTD
- -24.63%
- 6M
- -33.16%
- 1Y
- -48.27%
- 3Y*
- -22.22%
- 5Y*
- 4.03%
- 10Y*
- 5.25%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MONC.MI vs. NOVO-B.CO — Risk / Return Rank
MONC.MI
NOVO-B.CO
MONC.MI vs. NOVO-B.CO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Moncler SpA (MONC.MI) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NOVO-B.CO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MONC.MI | NOVO-B.CO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | -0.88 | +0.69 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | -1.12 | +1.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 0.85 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.30 | -0.87 | +0.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.55 | -1.48 | +0.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MONC.MI | NOVO-B.CO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 | -0.88 | +0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.11 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.16 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.47 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between MONC.MI and NOVO-B.CO is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MONC.MI vs. NOVO-B.CO - Dividend Comparison
MONC.MI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, less than NOVO-B.CO's 4.94% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MONC.MI Moncler SpA | 2.46% | 2.37% | 2.26% | 2.01% | 1.21% | 0.70% | 1.10% | 1.00% | 0.97% | 0.69% | 0.85% | 0.93% |
NOVO-B.CO Novo Nordisk A/S | 4.94% | 3.58% | 1.59% | 1.01% | 1.19% | 1.27% | 2.02% | 2.11% | 2.64% | 2.27% | 3.69% | 1.25% |
Drawdowns
MONC.MI vs. NOVO-B.CO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MONC.MI drawdown since its inception was -45.80%, smaller than the maximum NOVO-B.CO drawdown of -76.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MONC.MI and NOVO-B.CO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MONC.MI | NOVO-B.CO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.80% | -76.75% | +30.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.94% | -54.94% | +35.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.80% | -76.75% | +30.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.80% | -76.75% | +30.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.89% | -75.38% | +53.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.90% | -15.80% | -0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.98% | 32.14% | -21.16% |
Volatility
MONC.MI vs. NOVO-B.CO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Moncler SpA (MONC.MI) is 7.21%, while Novo Nordisk A/S (NOVO-B.CO) has a volatility of 9.13%. This indicates that MONC.MI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NOVO-B.CO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MONC.MI | NOVO-B.CO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.21% | 9.13% | -1.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.91% | 40.82% | -17.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.26% | 55.46% | -23.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.06% | 38.38% | -6.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.08% | 32.54% | -0.46% |
Financials
MONC.MI vs. NOVO-B.CO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Moncler SpA and Novo Nordisk A/S. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities