NOK vs. BIL
NOK (Nokia Corporation) is a stock, while BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. Over the past 10 years, NOK returned 14.39%/yr vs 2.18%/yr for BIL. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
NOK vs. BIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NOK achieves a 161.11% return, which is significantly higher than BIL's 1.49% return. Over the past 10 years, NOK has outperformed BIL with an annualized return of 14.39%, while BIL has yielded a comparatively lower 2.18% annualized return.
NOK
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 27.32%
- YTD
- 161.11%
- 6M
- 169.87%
- 1Y
- 221.63%
- 3Y*
- 65.59%
- 5Y*
- 28.11%
- 10Y*
- 14.39%
BIL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 3.87%
- 3Y*
- 4.64%
- 5Y*
- 3.41%
- 10Y*
- 2.18%
NOK vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOK Nokia Corporation | 161.11% | 50.85% | 34.33% | -23.97% | -24.44% | 59.08% | 5.39% | -34.91% | 30.04% | -0.22% |
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 1.49% | 4.15% | 5.19% | 4.94% | 1.40% | -0.10% | 0.40% | 2.03% | 1.74% | 0.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between NOK and BIL is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2007 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NOK vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank
NOK
BIL
NOK vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nokia Corporation (NOK) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NOK | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -15.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -169.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | 87.91 | -86.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.07 | 355.35 | -346.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.74 | 2,817.77 | -2,800.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NOK | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.39 | 19.71 | -15.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 13.16 | -12.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 8.52 | -8.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 2.78 | -2.58 |
Drawdowns
NOK vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOK drawdown since its inception was -95.99%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOK and BIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOK | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.99% | -0.78% | -95.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.59% | -0.01% | -24.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.74% | -0.01% | -29.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.56% | -0.10% | -50.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.56% | -0.21% | -62.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.59% | 0.00% | -43.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.87% | -0.26% | -64.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.55% | 0.00% | +12.55% |
Volatility
NOK vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison
Nokia Corporation (NOK) has a higher volatility of 23.85% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.05%. This indicates that NOK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NOK | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.85% | 0.05% | +23.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.35% | 0.13% | +37.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.83% | 0.20% | +50.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.43% | 0.26% | +36.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.21% | 0.26% | +39.95% |
Dividends
NOK vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison
NOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than BIL's 3.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.86% | 4.13% | 5.03% | 4.92% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 2.05% | 1.66% | 0.68% | 0.07% | 0.00% |
NOK Nokia Corporation | 0.98% | 2.45% | 3.17% | 3.51% | 1.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.01% | 4.06% | 4.07% | 6.02% | 2.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NOK and BIL have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NOK has higher volatility (23.85%) compared to BIL (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOK dropped -95.99% vs BIL's -0.78%.
BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.71 vs 4.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NOK and BIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer