PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOK vs. ERIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NOK vs. ERIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nokia Corporation (NOK) and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (ERIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOK achieves a 43.36% return, which is significantly higher than ERIC's 3.11% return. Over the past 10 years, NOK has outperformed ERIC with an annualized return of 7.32%, while ERIC has yielded a comparatively lower 5.79% annualized return.


NOK

1D
0.55%
1M
-23.90%
6M
44.25%
YTD
43.36%
1Y
130.28%
3Y*
36.45%
5Y*
11.29%
10Y*
7.32%
ALL TIME*
6.93%

ERIC

1D
0.41%
1M
-9.08%
6M
-7.87%
YTD
3.11%
1Y
39.83%
3Y*
29.69%
5Y*
0.49%
10Y*
5.79%
ALL TIME*
4.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$143.89M$174.55M$138.11M
$1.02B$1.02B$1.45B

NOK vs. ERIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOK
Nokia Corporation
43.36%50.85%34.33%-23.97%-24.44%59.08%5.39%-34.91%30.04%-0.22%
ERIC
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)
3.11%24.14%33.36%13.40%-44.43%-7.26%38.51%0.17%35.45%16.57%

Correlation

The correlation between NOK and ERIC is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1994

0.58

The correlation between NOK and ERIC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NOK:

$49.15B

ERIC:

$32.21B

EPS

NOK:

€0.13

ERIC:

SEK 7.34

PE Ratio

NOK:

63.09

ERIC:

12.76

PEG Ratio

NOK:

2.15

ERIC:

0.00

PS Ratio

NOK:

2.20

ERIC:

1.36

PB Ratio

NOK:

2.17

ERIC:

3.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

NOK:

€20.27B

ERIC:

SEK 228.76B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NOK:

€9.00B

ERIC:

SEK 110.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

NOK:

€2.15B

ERIC:

SEK 42.03B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOK vs. ERIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NOK
NOK Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
NOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOK Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
NOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOK Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

ERIC
ERIC Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ERIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERIC Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
ERIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERIC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NOK vs. ERIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nokia Corporation (NOK) and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (ERIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOKERICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.24

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

1.26

+1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.67

4.27

+4.40

NOK vs. ERIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOK Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the ERIC Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOK and ERIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOK vs. ERIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOK drawdown since its inception was -95.99%, roughly equal to the maximum ERIC drawdown of -98.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOK and ERIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOKERICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.99%

-98.59%

+2.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.84%

-32.24%

-17.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.84%

-32.24%

-17.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.56%

-62.82%

+12.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.56%

-66.59%

+4.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-69.03%

-86.03%

+17.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.83%

-67.83%

+3.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.89%

9.49%

+5.40%

Volatility

NOK vs. ERIC - Volatility Comparison

Nokia Corporation (NOK) has a higher volatility of 21.89% compared to Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (ERIC) at 17.37%. This indicates that NOK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ERIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOKERICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.89%

17.37%

+4.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.57%

28.56%

+19.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.81%

38.91%

+19.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.46%

35.12%

+3.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.10%

35.43%

+5.67%

Dividends

NOK vs. ERIC - Dividend Comparison

NOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than ERIC's 3.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ERIC
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)
3.19%3.04%3.22%4.07%4.22%2.15%1.36%1.24%1.42%1.67%5.14%5.30%
NOK
Nokia Corporation
1.78%2.45%3.17%3.51%1.32%0.00%0.00%3.01%4.06%4.07%6.02%2.22%

Financials

NOK vs. ERIC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nokia Corporation and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ). You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

NOK vs. ERIC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Nokia Corporation and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

NOK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Nokia Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.15B and revenue of 4.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.6%.

ERIC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) reported a gross profit of 26.27B and revenue of 54.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.4%.

NOK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Nokia Corporation reported an operating income of -50.00M and revenue of 4.82B, resulting in an operating margin of -1.0%.

ERIC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) reported an operating income of 6.69B and revenue of 54.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.3%.

NOK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Nokia Corporation reported a net income of 2.00M and revenue of 4.82B, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.

ERIC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) reported a net income of 4.17B and revenue of 54.32B, resulting in a net margin of 7.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NOK and ERIC have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOK has higher volatility (21.89%) compared to ERIC (17.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOK dropped -95.99% vs ERIC's -98.59%.

NOK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOK and ERIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer