NOIEX vs. QTJL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NOIEX (Northern Income Equity Fund) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both funds - NOIEX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Northern Funds, while QTJL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Innovator. Over the past 3 years, NOIEX returned 22.56%/yr vs 19.18%/yr for QTJL. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NOIEX charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.

Performance

NOIEX vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Income Equity Fund (NOIEX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOIEX achieves a 11.81% return, which is significantly higher than QTJL's 7.18% return.

NOIEX

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: 4.15%
• YTD: 11.81%
• 6M: 12.02%
• 1Y: 29.63%
• 3Y*: 22.56%
• 5Y*: 13.83%
• 10Y*: 13.92%

QTJL

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 1.08%
• YTD: 7.18%
• 6M: 7.93%
• 1Y: 20.28%
• 3Y*: 19.18%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOIEX vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
NOIEX Northern Income Equity Fund	11.81%	18.81%	24.28%	19.56%	-13.34%	10.77%
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July	7.18%	21.07%	16.50%	42.39%	-30.16%	9.32%

Correlation

The correlation between NOIEX and QTJL is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021	0.83

The correlation between NOIEX and QTJL shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NOIEX vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOIEX

NOIEX Risk / Return Rank: 77
NOIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
NOIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
NOIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
NOIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
NOIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

QTJL

QTJL Risk / Return Rank: 68
QTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
QTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
QTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 71
QTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
QTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOIEX vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Income Equity Fund (NOIEX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NOIEX	QTJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.57	2.04	+0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.57	2.90	+0.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.41	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.61	3.05	+0.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.44	16.05	+0.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NOIEX vs. QTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOIEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is comparable to the QTJL Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOIEX and QTJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NOIEX	QTJL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.57	2.04	+0.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	0.52	+0.16

Drawdowns

NOIEX vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOIEX drawdown since its inception was -45.66%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOIEX and QTJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	NOIEX	QTJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.66%	-33.40%	-12.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.39%	-6.68%	-1.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.06%	-22.43%	+4.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.88%	0.00%	-0.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.99%	-7.93%	+2.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.83%	1.27%	+0.56%

Volatility

NOIEX vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison

Northern Income Equity Fund (NOIEX) has a higher volatility of 2.83% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) at 0.30%. This indicates that NOIEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NOIEX	QTJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.83%	0.30%	+2.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.75%	7.60%	+1.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.82%	9.99%	+1.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.36%	20.42%	-4.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.96%	20.42%	-2.46%

NOIEX vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOIEX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

NOIEX vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison

NOIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.21%, while QTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NOIEX Northern Income Equity Fund	7.21%	7.92%	6.11%	7.03%	5.44%	14.26%	7.67%	8.58%	15.73%	7.56%	3.02%	5.57%
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NOIEX and QTJL in my portfolio?

NOIEX and QTJL have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NOIEX or QTJL?

NOIEX has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to QTJL (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOIEX dropped -45.66% vs QTJL's -33.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NOIEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.