PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOIEX vs. FBLEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOIEX vs. FBLEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Income Equity Fund (NOIEX) and Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOIEX achieves a 12.80% return, which is significantly higher than FBLEX's 8.36% return. Over the past 10 years, NOIEX has outperformed FBLEX with an annualized return of 14.02%, while FBLEX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.89% annualized return.


NOIEX

1D
0.39%
1M
6.04%
YTD
12.80%
6M
13.13%
1Y
30.77%
3Y*
22.92%
5Y*
14.24%
10Y*
14.02%

FBLEX

1D
0.33%
1M
2.07%
YTD
8.36%
6M
9.82%
1Y
22.33%
3Y*
19.15%
5Y*
11.55%
10Y*
11.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOIEX vs. FBLEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOIEX
Northern Income Equity Fund
12.80%18.81%24.28%19.56%-13.34%27.96%11.03%27.04%-6.62%20.22%
FBLEX
Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund
8.36%17.06%18.04%15.60%-4.82%26.83%4.34%25.57%-9.04%12.38%

Correlation

The correlation between NOIEX and FBLEX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2012

0.89

The correlation between NOIEX and FBLEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOIEX vs. FBLEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOIEX
NOIEX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
NOIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
NOIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

FBLEX
FBLEX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FBLEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBLEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBLEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FBLEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBLEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOIEX vs. FBLEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Income Equity Fund (NOIEX) and Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NOIEXFBLEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.40

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.85

3.35

+0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.52

13.56

+3.96

NOIEX vs. FBLEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOIEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is comparable to the FBLEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOIEX and FBLEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NOIEXFBLEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.74

2.20

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.78

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.69

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.73

-0.04

Drawdowns

NOIEX vs. FBLEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOIEX drawdown since its inception was -45.66%, which is greater than FBLEX's maximum drawdown of -39.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOIEX and FBLEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOIEXFBLEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.66%

-39.73%

-5.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.39%

-6.89%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.06%

-14.71%

-3.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.89%

-19.00%

-2.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.31%

-39.73%

+4.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.20%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.99%

-3.83%

-1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

1.70%

+0.12%

Volatility

NOIEX vs. FBLEX - Volatility Comparison

Northern Income Equity Fund (NOIEX) and Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX) have volatilities of 2.73% and 2.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOIEXFBLEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

2.69%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.71%

7.89%

+0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.78%

10.50%

+1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.36%

14.79%

+1.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.96%

17.40%

+0.56%

NOIEX vs. FBLEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOIEX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FBLEX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOIEX vs. FBLEX - Dividend Comparison

NOIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.15%, less than FBLEX's 10.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBLEX
Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund
10.25%9.95%12.63%5.05%12.66%14.51%3.85%5.65%10.97%7.09%2.47%13.81%
NOIEX
Northern Income Equity Fund
7.15%7.92%6.11%7.03%5.44%14.26%7.67%8.58%15.73%7.56%3.02%5.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOIEX and FBLEX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOIEX has higher volatility (2.73%) compared to FBLEX (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOIEX dropped -45.66% vs FBLEX's -39.73%.

NOIEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOIEX and FBLEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer