PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOCT vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOCT vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October (NOCT) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOCT achieves a 7.61% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return.


NOCT

1D
-0.12%
1M
2.54%
YTD
7.61%
6M
7.69%
1Y
17.36%
3Y*
14.98%
5Y*
10.46%
10Y*

QQQ

1D
-0.26%
1M
10.60%
YTD
21.30%
6M
19.66%
1Y
41.82%
3Y*
28.78%
5Y*
17.97%
10Y*
21.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOCT vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
NOCT
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October
7.61%12.81%12.10%30.67%-13.42%12.10%11.64%5.54%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
21.30%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%13.78%

Correlation

The correlation between NOCT and QQQ is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2019

0.89

The correlation between NOCT and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

NOCT vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NOCT
QQQ

Technology

54.2%
53.8%

Communication Services

15.5%
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%
7.7%

Healthcare

4.2%
4.2%

Industrials

2.8%
2.8%

Utilities

1.4%
1.4%

Basic Materials

1.2%
1.1%

Energy

0.6%
0.6%

Financial Services

0.2%
0.2%

Real Estate

0.1%
0.1%

Technology

NOCT
54.2%
QQQ
53.8%

Communication Services

NOCT
15.5%
QQQ
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

NOCT
12.2%
QQQ
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

NOCT
7.6%
QQQ
7.7%

Healthcare

NOCT
4.2%
QQQ
4.2%

Industrials

NOCT
2.8%
QQQ
2.8%

Utilities

NOCT
1.4%
QQQ
1.4%

Basic Materials

NOCT
1.2%
QQQ
1.1%

Energy

NOCT
0.6%
QQQ
0.6%

Financial Services

NOCT
0.2%
QQQ
0.2%

Real Estate

NOCT
0.1%
QQQ
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOCT vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOCT
NOCT Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
NOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
NOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOCT vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October (NOCT) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NOCTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.45

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

3.51

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.90

13.49

+0.40

NOCT vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOCT Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOCT and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NOCTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

2.64

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.81

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

0.41

+0.60

Drawdowns

NOCT vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOCT drawdown since its inception was -16.21%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOCT and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOCTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.21%

-82.97%

+66.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.84%

-11.96%

+6.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.70%

-22.77%

+10.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.21%

-35.12%

+18.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-0.26%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.34%

-32.79%

+30.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

3.11%

-1.86%

Volatility

NOCT vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October (NOCT) is 1.01%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that NOCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOCTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.01%

4.49%

-3.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.90%

12.10%

-6.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.55%

15.94%

-8.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.93%

22.38%

-11.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.19%

22.29%

-11.10%

NOCT vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOCT vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

NOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOCT
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, NOCT and QQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QQQ has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to NOCT (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOCT dropped -16.21% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 17.97% vs 10.46% for NOCT. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, NOCT has been the lower-risk option at 1.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 17.97% return vs 10.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for NOCT.

QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for NOCT.

NOCT is categorized as Defined Outcome, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NOCT and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOCT and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer