NOCT vs. QQQ
NOCT (Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NOCT is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. NOCT is actively managed, while QQQ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NOCT returned 10.46%/yr vs 17.97%/yr for QQQ. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NOCT charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
NOCT vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NOCT achieves a 7.61% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return.
NOCT
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 2.54%
- YTD
- 7.61%
- 6M
- 7.69%
- 1Y
- 17.36%
- 3Y*
- 14.98%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 10.60%
- YTD
- 21.30%
- 6M
- 19.66%
- 1Y
- 41.82%
- 3Y*
- 28.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.97%
- 10Y*
- 21.94%
NOCT vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOCT Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October | 7.61% | 12.81% | 12.10% | 30.67% | -13.42% | 12.10% | 11.64% | 5.54% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.30% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 13.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between NOCT and QQQ is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2019 | 0.89 |
The correlation between NOCT and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
NOCT vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NOCT
QQQ
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
NOCT
QQQ
Communication Services
NOCT
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
NOCT
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
NOCT
QQQ
Healthcare
NOCT
QQQ
Industrials
NOCT
QQQ
Utilities
NOCT
QQQ
Basic Materials
NOCT
QQQ
Energy
NOCT
QQQ
Financial Services
NOCT
QQQ
Real Estate
NOCT
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NOCT vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
NOCT
QQQ
NOCT vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October (NOCT) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NOCT | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.45 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.99 | 3.51 | -0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.90 | 13.49 | +0.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NOCT | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | 2.64 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.81 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | 0.41 | +0.60 |
Drawdowns
NOCT vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOCT drawdown since its inception was -16.21%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOCT and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOCT | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.21% | -82.97% | +66.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.84% | -11.96% | +6.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.70% | -22.77% | +10.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.21% | -35.12% | +18.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -0.26% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.34% | -32.79% | +30.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.25% | 3.11% | -1.86% |
Volatility
NOCT vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October (NOCT) is 1.01%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that NOCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NOCT | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.01% | 4.49% | -3.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.90% | 12.10% | -6.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.55% | 15.94% | -8.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.93% | 22.38% | -11.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.19% | 22.29% | -11.10% |
NOCT vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
NOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
NOCT vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
NOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOCT Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, NOCT and QQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QQQ has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to NOCT (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOCT dropped -16.21% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 17.97% vs 10.46% for NOCT. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, NOCT has been the lower-risk option at 1.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 17.97% return vs 10.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for NOCT.
QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for NOCT.
NOCT is categorized as Defined Outcome, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NOCT and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NOCT and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer