PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOCT vs. DIA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOCT vs. DIA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October (NOCT) and State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOCT achieves a 7.61% return, which is significantly higher than DIA's 6.26% return.


NOCT

1D
-0.12%
1M
2.54%
YTD
7.61%
6M
7.69%
1Y
17.36%
3Y*
14.98%
5Y*
10.46%
10Y*

DIA

1D
-1.13%
1M
3.88%
YTD
6.26%
6M
6.75%
1Y
21.13%
3Y*
16.45%
5Y*
9.76%
10Y*
13.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOCT vs. DIA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
NOCT
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October
7.61%12.81%12.10%30.67%-13.42%12.10%11.64%5.54%
DIA
State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust
6.26%14.71%14.82%16.02%-7.02%20.83%9.59%7.98%

Correlation

The correlation between NOCT and DIA is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2019

0.66

The correlation between NOCT and DIA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

NOCT vs. DIA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NOCT
DIA

Technology

54.2%
17.1%

Communication Services

15.5%
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%
4.4%

Healthcare

4.2%
13.1%

Industrials

2.8%
18.4%

Utilities

1.4%

-

Basic Materials

1.2%
4.0%

Energy

0.6%
2.4%

Financial Services

0.2%
27.2%

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

NOCT
54.2%
DIA
17.1%

Communication Services

NOCT
15.5%
DIA
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

NOCT
12.2%
DIA
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

NOCT
7.6%
DIA
4.4%

Healthcare

NOCT
4.2%
DIA
13.1%

Industrials

NOCT
2.8%
DIA
18.4%

Utilities

NOCT
1.4%
DIA

-

Basic Materials

NOCT
1.2%
DIA
4.0%

Energy

NOCT
0.6%
DIA
2.4%

Financial Services

NOCT
0.2%
DIA
27.2%

Real Estate

NOCT
0.1%
DIA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOCT vs. DIA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOCT
NOCT Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
NOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
NOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

DIA
DIA Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
DIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIA Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
DIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIA Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOCT vs. DIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October (NOCT) and State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NOCTDIADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.31

1.76

+0.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.26

2.57

+0.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.31

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

2.18

+0.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.90

8.42

+5.48

NOCT vs. DIA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOCT Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the DIA Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOCT and DIA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NOCTDIADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

1.76

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.66

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

0.49

+0.52

Drawdowns

NOCT vs. DIA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOCT drawdown since its inception was -16.21%, smaller than the maximum DIA drawdown of -51.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOCT and DIA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOCTDIADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.21%

-51.87%

+35.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.84%

-9.76%

+3.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.70%

-15.95%

+3.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.21%

-20.76%

+4.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-1.13%

+0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.34%

-7.14%

+4.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

2.52%

-1.27%

Volatility

NOCT vs. DIA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October (NOCT) is 1.01%, while State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) has a volatility of 2.97%. This indicates that NOCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOCTDIADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.01%

2.97%

-1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.90%

9.28%

-3.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.55%

12.10%

-4.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.93%

14.78%

-3.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.19%

17.53%

-6.34%

NOCT vs. DIA - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DIA's 0.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOCT vs. DIA - Dividend Comparison

NOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIA
State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust
1.38%1.43%1.61%1.81%1.91%1.58%1.87%1.85%2.24%1.97%2.26%2.33%
NOCT
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOCT and DIA have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIA has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to NOCT (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOCT dropped -16.21% vs DIA's -51.87%.

On 5-year performance, NOCT leads with 10.46% vs 9.76% for DIA. On fees, DIA is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, NOCT has been the lower-risk option at 1.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NOCT has performed better with a 10.46% return vs 9.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIA is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for NOCT.

DIA has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.00% for NOCT.

NOCT is categorized as Defined Outcome, while DIA is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NOCT and 0.16% for DIA.

NOCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOCT and DIA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer