NOCT vs. JULB
NOCT (Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October) and JULB (Aptus July Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NOCT charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JULB.
Performance
NOCT vs. JULB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NOCT achieves a 7.61% return, which is significantly higher than JULB's 6.35% return.
NOCT
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 2.54%
- YTD
- 7.61%
- 6M
- 7.69%
- 1Y
- 17.36%
- 3Y*
- 14.98%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- —
JULB
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- YTD
- 6.35%
- 6M
- 6.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NOCT vs. JULB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NOCT Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October | 7.61% | 2.44% |
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF | 6.35% | 2.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between NOCT and JULB is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025 | 0.92 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NOCT vs. JULB — Risk / Return Rank
NOCT
JULB
NOCT vs. JULB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October (NOCT) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NOCT | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.99 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.90 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NOCT | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | 2.17 | -1.16 |
Drawdowns
NOCT vs. JULB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOCT drawdown since its inception was -16.21%, which is greater than JULB's maximum drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOCT and JULB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOCT | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.21% | -5.24% | -10.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -0.07% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.34% | -0.87% | -1.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.25% | — | — |
Volatility
NOCT vs. JULB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NOCT | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.01% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.90% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.55% | 6.81% | +0.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.93% | 6.81% | +4.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.19% | 6.81% | +4.38% |
NOCT vs. JULB - Expense Ratio Comparison
NOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than JULB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
NOCT vs. JULB - Dividend Comparison
Neither NOCT nor JULB has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NOCT Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, NOCT and JULB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, JULB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JULB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for NOCT.
NOCT and JULB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NOCT and 0.25% for JULB.
Find the right allocation for NOCT and JULB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer